Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4) The circuit breaker exposition in the revenue offsets section does not show any turn back of <br />circuit breaker funds. <br />The total expended line includes any turnback for account balance purposes, but we can add a <br />note or a separate line to identify turnbacks from expended amounts. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5) Does the budget take the 14% OOD tuition increase for FY2024 into account? <br /> <br />Yes, the tuition increase is included in the calculation of tuition projections. For FY 2024, we are <br />fortunate to have a significant increase in the number of “age-outs” (students reaching age <br />22). We also have over $700K additional in offsets available (Circuit Breaker and grants) to <br />apply against the tuition line. We anticipate that we would see a greater impact from the 14% <br />tuition hike in the FY 2025 budget and beyond. <br /> <br />6) We have heard that there have been significant changes in the estimated salary differential <br />item, and would like to hear about it from your perspective. <br />Every year we experience varying levels of staff turnover and through it salary churn between <br />the end of school year and the opening of the new year. In the past few budgets, we have <br />targeted this number at $750K to $850K against the salary line. In FY 2018 it was $1M. <br /> <br />In reality the number has been higher, more in the $1.3M to $1.4M range. Because the district <br />had to address immediate and significant student needs, we increased the savings target to add <br />the flexibility to hire the necessary staff. We recognize that this impacts potential turnback funds <br />which could impact FY 2025, but the immediate legally-mandated needs of the students are <br />paramount. In addition, we have experienced a significant increase in vacancies during the <br />school year, which is simultaneously yielding additional turnback funds. These vacancy savings <br />have been approximately $400K to $500K per year pre-pandemic to about twice that amount in <br />the last couple of fiscal years. Given these indicators, it would appear to be a lower-risk option <br />than opening ourselves us to possible legal challenges, cutting a program, expense line, or <br />existing staff. <br /> <br />7) The term “revenue offset” can be interpreted several ways. Clarify please. <br />For our purposes, revenue offsets are revenue generated from departmental activities, such as <br />athletic fees, bus fees, and circuit breaker reimbursements that reduce the district’s expenses <br />funded by the operating budget allocation. <br />8) This may be nit-picking, so please let me know if it is. The table on expenses on Expenses <br />pp.2-3 doesn’t use the latest enrollment data. <br />Not at all; if there are inaccuracies in the information that we provide, we want to know. We <br />believe that is that we received from the Data Team, and we are constantly refining enrollment <br />numbers during the process. It also is possible that it might have been a typographical error. It <br />looks like the numbers used in the Expense Table are off by approximately 10 students. When <br />we ran the numbers using 10 students at the elementary level, the resulting difference was <br />under $2,500.