|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2002-11-05-State-Election-Warrant
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
ELECTIONS AND TOWN MEETING ACTION & WARRANTS
>
Town Meeting and Election Warrants
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
2002-11-05-State-Election-Warrant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2023 6:38:38 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 6:17:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2002
Keywords or Subject
2002-11-05-State-Election-Warrant State Election
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All English learners in grades kindergarten and up would take annual standardized tests of <br /> English skills. All English learners in grades 2 and up would take annual written standardized tests, in <br /> English, of academic subjects. Severely learning disabled students could be exempted from the tests. <br /> Individual scores would be released only to parents, but aggregate scores, school and school district <br /> rankings, the number of English learners in each school and district, and related data would be made <br /> public. <br /> The proposed law would provide, subject to the state Legislature's appropriation, $5 million each <br /> year for 10 years for school committees to provide free or low-cost English language instruction to <br /> adults who pledged to tutor English learners. <br /> The proposed law would replace the current law, under which a school committee must establish <br /> a transitional bilingual education program for any 20 or more enrolled children of the same language <br /> group who cannot do ordinary classwork in English and whose native language is not English or whose <br /> parents do not speak English. In that program, schools must teach all required courses in both English <br /> and the child's native language; teach both the native language and English; and teach the history and <br /> culture of both the native land of the child's parents and the United States. Teaching of non-required <br /> subjects may be in a language other than English, and for subjects where verbalization is not essential <br /> (such as art or music), the child must participate in regular classes with English-speaking students. <br /> Under the current law, a child stays in the program for 3 years or until the child can perform <br /> successfully in English-only classes, whichever occurs first. A test of the child's English skills is given <br /> each year. A school committee may not transfer a child out of the program before the third year unless <br /> the parents approve and the child has received an English-skills test score appropriate to the child's <br /> grade level. A child may stay in the program longer than 3 years if the school committee and the parent <br /> or guardian approve. Parents must be informed of their child's enrollment in the program and have the <br /> right to withdraw their child from the program. <br /> The proposed law's testing requirements would take effect immediately, and its other <br /> requirements would govern all school years beginning after the proposed law's effective date. The <br /> proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect. <br /> A YES VOTE would require that, with limited exceptions, all public school children must be taught <br /> English by being taught all subjects in English and being placed in English language classrooms. <br /> A NO VOTE would make no changes in English language education in public schools. <br /> QUESTION 3: THIS QUESTION IS NOT BINDING <br /> Do you support taxpayer money being used to fund political campaigns for public office in the <br /> Commonwealth of Massachusetts? <br /> QUESTION 4: THIS QUESTION IS NOT BINDING <br /> (9`h Middlesex — Precincts 2, 3, 4) <br /> Shall the state representative from this district be instructed to vote in favor of legislation that would <br /> fully implement and fund the state's voter-approved Clean Elections law, which provides a set amount <br /> of public funding for candidates who agree to strict fundraising and spending limits? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.