2023-01-11-AC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

01/11/2023 AC Minutes 3 and new stairs. There is a transition from the lower ground entrance to the floors in the existing building. Mr. Kanter asked what kind of fuel would be used to drive the new HVAC system. Mr. Healy stated it would be electric. Mr. Kanter asked if solar power would be included in the design. Mr. Healy stated they have discussed it but would only do so if solar was “efficient and not [merely] sym- bolic”. The Munroe Center hired and paid Brian Healy Architects to produce a design and a related cost es- timate. The Committee asked why the Munroe Center should be paying for this, and strongly sug- gested that the expense for architectural design services on a Town-owned building should be borne by the Town. Ms. Yan asked if the rent would increase to help pay for the project. Ms. Burwell noted that she ex- pected higher operating expenses after the project is complete, but she had no plans to increase the rent for tenants, and Ms. Kosnoff stated that the Town did not expect to raise the rent under the cur- rent lease. Mr. Osborne asked about the parking situation at the building. Mr. Healy stated that they are re- quired to provide 42 parking spaces with 2 ADA spaces. They are trying to minimize asphalt and maximize green space while improving safety and access for emergency vehicles. Mr. Osborne asked if changes to the parking would affect utility service to the building. Mr. Healy noted that the project needed to manage all stormwater runoff from the new addition and that there will be a stormwater management system with collection basins. Mr. Michelson asked for clarification on the cost spreadsheet for the project that was provided to the Committee, since he could not find line items for the cost of the HVAC system and elevator. Mr. Healy explained that the full cost estimate was 42 pages, and that the spreadsheet sent to the Committee showed only a summary of suggested reductions in scope and cost, so the costs for the HVAC and elevator are not shown as separate items. Mr. Parker asked what needs would remain for the building once this project was completed. Mr. Poltorzycki stated that Mr. Healy had developed a master plan that covered many areas on the cam- pus, but the urgent need for improvements to accessibility and HVAC superseded any other work. Funding for additional changes will be difficult for the Munroe Center to raise and would likely not be feasible within the next 3–5 years. Mr. Poltorzycki stated that the building is in good condition for its age, but that it will eventually require further maintenance. Mr. Healy stated that the current project design anticipates future growth, and that they avoided spending in areas that might conflict with future projects. Ms. Burwell stated that this year they have painted the building exterior, com- pleted the window upgrades, and replaced the roof, but that the gutters need some attention. She feels that the building is in “pretty decent shape”. Mr. Poltorzycki noted that a more intense renova- tion would have interrupted programming, which they wanted to avoid, but that he feels they will be set for at least the next five years. Mr. Bartenstein asked about the fee structure for tenants in the building. Ms. Burwell noted that they impose a building restoration fee. Mr. Poltorzycki stated that they have three large tenants who pay rent, along with ten studio artists, and the Munroe Center runs a visual arts program that charges fees to students. Mr. Poltorzycki stated that the lease requires the Munroe Center to cover all operational costs. Mr. Bartenstein asked if annual revenue was adequate to cover expenses. Mr. Poltorzycki stated that they operate “in the black” every year.