2022-12-01-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 Willard’s Woods: Amber Carr, Conservation Coordinator returned and stated that a consultant had walked the Willard’s Woods site and made some decisions that were not reflected in their previous presentation. Ms. Carr stated that the proposed “wet meadow addition” is not realistic for consideration and the boardwalk extension component of the project would add some costs, but that the Conservation Division is actively looking for an alternative means of funding the additional costs with supplemental grants. Ms. Carr also stated that the proposed trail widths will be anywhere from 5-10 feet wide, depending on the section, and mentioned that Brent Road serves as access for fire and other emergency services. Ms. Fenollosa asked if the prior uncertainties (materials, access, parking) had been completely resolved. Ms. Carr stated that the Conservation Commission meeting on December 14th would finalize those decisions but reiterated that she was showing the Committee what was going to be shown to the public and subject to their approval. Mr. Beuttell asked if stabilized stone dust would meet access requirements or asphalt for the entrance or parking area. Mr. Sandeen asked about whether or not to designate the trail area as fully accessible and whether or not that would affect the construction costs. Ms. Carr stated that the policy decision would be finalized at a later date but that the construction specifications would not change. Ms. Carr also stated that the Conservation Commission would not build to Universal Access standards and not tell the public about it. Mr. Creech mentioned that there are different widths of trails mentioned in the slide presentation and suggested that bike racks be installed at the entrances so that people who arrive on bikes can walk the trails instead of riding the trails. This would not require such wide trails and therefore cost less money. Ms. Walker asked if the cost would remain the same as the prior meeting; Ms. Carr responded that the boardwalk extension by the wet meadow would increase the cost by approximately $200,000. Mr. Horton concurred with Mr. Creech’s earlier suggestion about walking bicycles on the trail and Ms. Carr stated that as with Universal Accessibility designation, the public meeting would determine the rules of the trail. After a motion was duly made and seconded the Committee conducted a roll call vote in a straw poll (8-0-1) to support the project. Archaeology Bylaw: Dr. Jeff Howry, an archaeologist, joined the Committee to advocate for the passage of an archaeology bylaw and request $65,000 in funding to identify sensitive sites that would be protected by such a bylaw. Dr Howry explained how this would be used to save historic and cultural resources and to avoid the disturbance of historic sites by construction. Dr. Howry mentioned how a prior bylaw enacted by the Town of Acton provides a good legal basis for the Town to adopt such a bylaw and that with the increase of commercial building, quick action is needed. Ms. Fenollosa brought up concerns with the application raised by Town Counsel about the sequencing of events surrounding the application (requesting funding to identify archaeology sites before enacting a bylaw to protect them). Dr. Howry noted the variety of other communities that have passed similar bylaws, and offered to meet with Town Counsel to assuage any specific concerns that he raised. With this, the project was tabled until Dr. Howry communicates with Town Counsel to answer any of his specific question s.