Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />that the cycle has come around to where Bridge School athletic fields are ready for a new <br />renovation. Mr. Pressman asked what types of fields are at Bridge School and who uses them. <br />Mr. Filadoro stated that there is one baseball and one softball field. Mr. Coleman stated that <br />Lexington High School uses the outfield space for their Ultimate Frisbee team and that the <br />Bridge School uses the fields for PE classes and recess. Mr. Coleman added that Lexington Little <br />League uses the fields for their youth baseball and softball programs. Ms. Fenollosa asked if <br />Lexington Little league pays for the use of the field or if it falls under one of the Recreation <br />Department’s recreation programs. Mr. Coleman explained that Lexington Little League <br />qualifies as a "Tier 2” rental program and that for use of natural grass fields the organization <br />pays a flat rate per participant for the season. Mr. Coleman also stated that there are other <br />organizations that meet these criteria, including Lexington Babe Ruth (the next step in Youth <br />Baseball after Little League), Lexington United Soccer Club and Lexington Youth Lacrosse. Mr. <br />Pressman then asked if the money raised goes into the Enterprise Fund. Mr. Coleman stated <br />that it does. <br />Mr. Beuttell stated that in his professional capacity in the City of Cambridge he was aware that <br />their policies are such that CPC funds are not put into projects on school property. Mr. Beuttell <br />explained that the idea behind such a restriction is that when CPC funds are used to improve an <br />area, it becomes “protected open space,” and that Cambridge, when attempting to move a <br />school building and disturbing the footprint of a playground, was found to have violated Article <br />97 of the Massachusetts Constitution. Ms. Fenollosa shared what Lexington Town Counsel had <br />opined on the matter: “Article 97 issues certainly come up when a town dedicates any property <br />to park and arguably playground use. The CPA’s funding is not on its own what would create <br />this concern; a property is more likely to have Article 97 protections because of its existing use <br />as a field, not because of additional CPA funding. Mr. Beuttell also asked about the Weston & <br />Simpson report and the number of hours that were used by the different types of fields-- <br />specifically, whether or not due to the shift on what spring sports are being played there would <br />be a reduction in diamond fields (baseball/softball) and expansion of the number of multi-use <br />fields for sports such as soccer and lacrosse. Mr. Filadoro stated that they have previously <br />worked with Lexington Little League to make some of their fields more multi use. Ms. Battite <br />also added that the very reason for the Weston & Sampson report was to become more <br />efficient in the use of existing fields for sports that go beyond the spring/fall model to a three- <br />season or year-round model. Ms. Battite also stated that the current permitting system gives <br />preference to those sports that are in their traditional season. <br />Ms. Krieger asked about the source of water for the irrigation of the field. Mr. Filadoro then <br />stated that the irrigation system would be tied into the Town’s water supply. Ms. Krieger then <br />asked if there was any consideration to using well water at these sites instead of tying into the <br />Town. Mr. Filadoro said that with the necessary infrastructure to create a well and to keep it <br />running would not be worth it. Mr. Sandeen asked about the DPF plans and timing of Bridge <br />School’s potential renovation. Ms. Battite stated that she did not know when exactly Bridge <br />School would be completely rebuilt but most likely in 5 to 8 years , and after the completion of