Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br /> <br />• Demand Response Services <br />o The RIDE supports 58 cities and towns, a service augmented by supported <br />with Uber/Lyft that have WAVE Vehicles (w/c accessible vehicles); <br />o LexConnect, a subsidized taxi vouchers for up to 12 month, heavily <br />discounted, no w/c vehicles, <br />o FISH – volunteer program, medical program Boston Metro area, not w/c <br />accessible, often no waiting and no other people on the trip [if you were part <br />of the pilot, you may need to re-enroll] <br />o The Grid – fixed times, commuter shuttle. Wheelchair access needs to be <br />planned for as all vehicles are not fully accessible <br />o MAPC Taxi Grant has helped to add some accessible taxi availability up to <br />$5K to support rides. <br /> <br />• Other Opportunities <br />o Riders Transportation Advocacy Group with the MBTA, <br />https://www.mbta.com/accessibility/get-involved/rtag?utm_campaign=rtag- <br />launch&utm_source=swa <br />o Mobility Management Project – funding from MA Dept of Transportation, <br />work toward regionalizing transportation. Prior grant on Lex, Bedford, <br />Burlington – this effort was unsuccessful, but this next attempt will coordinate <br />services and other transportation resources and needs from Lexington, <br />Bedford, Burlington, Woburn, Winchester, Arlington, Belmont, and Waltham. <br />https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/b30ad87fac9940978859e738c88dffb5 <br /> <br />Presentation from Lex See Her <br />Jessie Steigerwald offered a presentation that started with a recap of their last visit to the <br />Commission in November, and then shared what the team learned from the rehearsal of the <br />project just before Thanksgiving. They proposed a few new design changes based on <br />concerns related to the busyness of the Sculpture platform. They now have resting places that <br />follow the perimeter, made of solid granite, curved to follow the arc of the circular footprint. <br />They have increased the size of the footprint and made the pavers bigger. They also <br />discussed engraving may be made available in different languages. <br /> <br />Meredith, the artist, discussed her process for new design where she felt the need for more <br />space to walk back and forth. Footprint has to match the scale of the object to ensure a <br />welcoming feeling. She also discussed inscribing the plaza and adding Braille. She wanted it <br />to be readable by tracing the letters. <br /> <br />Len endorsed extending the diameter to 28’ from 24’, and further supported the new bench <br />design. Victoria endorsed the larger pavers; John Rossi also supported the larger space to <br />ensure the accommodation of the density of larger numbers of people. <br /> <br />Commission voted to support the suggested design changes which included the use of larger <br />grant blocks, benches that follow the curve of the plaza, and an expansion of the diameter <br />from 24 to 28 feet in diameter. A voice vote was held which was unanimous in support of