Laserfiche WebLink
Youth Services In Lexington <br /> Report to the Board of Selectmen <br /> February 6,2006 <br /> "Solo practitioners, mental health practitioners within the agencies, and others we contacted in the <br /> course of this project concur generally that Lexington, with all of its abundance of helping talent, <br /> displays a serious lack of services for adolescents. There is also a lack of collaborative coordination <br /> between the solo practitioners and between professionals within Lexington High School and these <br /> practitioners..." <br /> MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN LEXINGTON,MASSACHUSETTS: <br /> A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN <br /> The Human Services Committee,December 2002 <br /> Introduction and History <br /> Prior to the effects of the failed 2003 Override, the Town of Lexington contracted for many years <br /> with Replace (which became Wayside RePlace)to provide services to high-risk youth in <br /> Lexington. Through collaboration with Lexington Public School administrators, and at a cost to <br /> the town of$74,087, RePlace provided the community with these services: <br /> • Clinic based counseling-For individuals, families and groups. Issues included <br /> development of social skills, substance abuse, racism,academic motivation, bullying, anger <br /> management, family problems, self-esteem, grief and addressing risky behavior. <br /> • Outreach Counseling & Community support-For issues such as suicide, child abuse, <br /> runaways and other family conflicts. <br /> • Prevention services-Including information and referral and development of a student <br /> outreach program for issues such as substance abuse, bullying, community violence and <br /> general positive health promotion. <br /> In response to the loss of RePlace,the Human Services Committee made a recommendation for a <br /> task force to be convened under the guidance of Selectman Bill Kennedy,to review services and <br /> gaps in services. The group determined that there were a wide variety of services in the <br /> community, but they lacked overall coordination. <br /> The goal, as defined by the task force, was to develop a continuum of services for youth and their <br /> families, building on what is working well, and filling identified gaps in services. The task for <br /> emphasized the need for strong and continued communication and collaboration among the <br /> schools, police and social services personnel as well as outreach to community agencies and <br /> committees focused on youth and family services. <br /> To achieve this goal, the task force recommended (1)the development of the Youth Services <br /> Council, (2)the creation of a youth services clinician position, (3)the creation of a fund, to be <br /> administered by the Department of Social Services,that would allow youth without insurance <br /> coverage to access services from local practitioners, and (4)the reinstatement of the School <br /> Resource Officer position at the Senior High School. <br />