Laserfiche WebLink
The Chair opened the discussion by circulating the draft letter(Attachment B), and members took time to read it <br /> over.A motion was made(Flood)and seconded(Manjarrez)to approve the letter of concern regarding David <br /> Manjarrez as written and send it to Myron J.Fox,the Moderator of Sudbury. <br /> A second motion was made(Manjarrez)and seconded(Spalding)to move the question and end debate. The <br /> following vote was taken: <br /> ACTION 2014#114 <br /> Moved(Manjarrez)and seconded(Spalding) <br /> To move the question and end debate <br /> Vote: 4 in favor,9 opposed <br /> Since the motion did not carry,the discussion on the matter began. Opinions expressed included that the letter was <br /> well-crafted,and could be supported;that it was sad that the School Committee has come to this in its professional <br /> work;whether the letter captured the essence of concerns,including costs and time expended to defend the range of <br /> OML complaints,and whether a pattern has in fact been articulated;that the member's behavior is intolerable; <br /> whether material from the OML complaints should be included,and what the desired outcome of sending such a <br /> letter is. The Chair articulated that the only recourse is to complain,that the particular components of the letter were <br /> included because they point to concerns about judgment,particularly with regard to students,and that there were <br /> practical considerations involved in choosing what to include.He apologized for the imperfections in the document, <br /> but noted that in his judgment,and after consulting with counsel,he was happy with the result and urged that the <br /> School Committee approve it as is.A motion was then made to move the question,and the following vote was <br /> taken: <br /> ACTION 2014#115 <br /> Moved(Spalding)and seconded(Mahoney) <br /> To move the question and end debate <br /> Vote: 11 in favor,2 opposed <br /> A motion was made by Mr.Manjarrez to reconsider the question so that he could comment. The Chair apologized, <br /> but said this was not possible. The following vote on the main motion was then taken: <br /> ACTION 2014#116 <br /> Moved(Flood)and seconded(Manjarrez) <br /> To approve the letter of concern regarding David Manjarrez as written and send it to Myron J.Fox,the <br /> Moderator of Sudbury <br /> Vote: 10 in favor,3 opposed <br /> A second motion was made(Flood)and seconded(Spalding)to send an electronic copy of the letter of concern <br /> regarding David Manjarrez to Myron J.Fox,Moderator of Sudbury to each School Committee member. It was <br /> explained that it would be easier to forward to anyone who might wish to see it. A member suggested sending it <br /> electronically only if someone requested it,and the following vote was taken: <br /> ACTION 2014#117 <br /> Moved(Castagno)and seconded(Manjarrez) <br /> To send an electronic copy of the letter to each School Committee member,only if requested <br /> Vote: 2 in favor,9 opposed,2 abstentions <br /> This vote did not pass. Mr.Manjarrez began to explain the outcome of his OML filings,but this was found to be <br /> outside of the motion on the table. He further noted that this letter gives solidity to Sudbury's growing concerns <br /> about Minuteman. The member from Boxborough noted that this letter answers her town's concern about what the <br /> School Committee has done about these issues; she also noted that she has never heard from Mr.Fox about the <br /> concern she wrote to him about. Her comment was found to be outside the scope of the motion on the table. A <br /> motion was made to move the question,and the following votes were taken: <br /> ACTION 2014#118 <br /> Moved(Spalding)and seconded(Banks) <br /> To move the question and end debate <br /> Vote: 12 in favor,1 opposed <br />