Laserfiche WebLink
member from Lexington offered to provide information on what was done in the past,and the member from <br /> Sudbury offered to help with the technical details. It was suggested that the complications cited above might only <br /> apply in 5%of the cases. The Chair urged Ms.Castagno to talk with the Superintendent,as he is aware of the <br /> request,and to report back when her research is complete. <br /> 2. Discussion of preparation/dissemination of information re selected agenda topics <br /> The Chair addressed one suggestion related to Governance Issues,namely the dissemination of information by <br /> School Committee members in advance of meetings. He noted that he discussed this with the attorney,and was <br /> advised that materials from School Committee members cannot be disseminated in advance,either by email to the <br /> group,by email from the Assistant,or in the packet,but rather,are to be at the table at the meeting for discussion,to <br /> avoid violations of Open Meeting Law. He clarified that he as Chair can request that comments be submitted,and <br /> that they can be compiled and presented as part of the presentation material at the table,as was done with the <br /> comments requested at the last meeting,currently at the table.The member who submitted this suggestion expressed <br /> his frustration that the Administration is allowed to do this,and it gives disproportionate weight to the <br /> Administration.He cited his own analysis on the 628 student number as an example.Another member expressed <br /> that this is not only an OML issue,but a process issue. The Chair explained that the Superintendent is the CEO,and <br /> is not a School Committee member,therefore,not subject to the restrictions of the OML. The Vice Chair concurred, <br /> noting that this has been an issue for a long time in many public bodies,but the School Committee is not allowed to <br /> offer opinions until the open meeting. <br /> b. Approved District Goals 2014-15:Measurement Criteria,Nancy Banks <br /> The Secretary explained that she reviewed the material received,and fine-tuned the language of the approved goals <br /> to reflect the SMART goal language,and responsible parties. She pointed out a typo in Goal#2. The member from <br /> Wayland urged that School Committee members need to be included in scheduling of events related to enrollment, <br /> such as 8th grade family nights,assemblies at the school,and community tours. She noted that there has been no <br /> Minuteman representative in attendance for the last 4 years at a particular 8th grade event in her community,and <br /> there is only 1 Wayland student at Minuteman this year. In response to a request for clarification,the Secretary <br /> pointed out that goal#5 was reflected in the Superintendent goals,to be presented later in the meeting by Mr. <br /> Horton. Concern was raised about shifting the responsibility of the goal to increase enrollment to the School <br /> Committee,which has no control over resources. It was clarified that School Committee members need to advocate <br /> for the school and that it is a collaborative effort,given the Administration's inability to attend every event in every <br /> community. The following vote was then taken: <br /> ACTION 2014#94 <br /> Moved(Banks)and seconded(Spalding) <br /> To approve the amended District Goals 2014-15 (items 1,2,3,4,and 6) as presented (with#5 incorporated <br /> after the later discussion/vote) <br /> Vote: 11 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 abstention(with 13 members present) <br /> The approved amended District Goals 2014-15 can be found as Attachment B. <br /> 4. MSBA BUILDING DESIGN DISCUSSION <br /> a. Expert Presentation: Advanced Manufacturing <br /> The Chair noted a delay in this item;the presenter did not show up by the end of the meeting. <br /> b. Discussion re comments received from SC Members on"Next Steps/Innovative Ideas",Jeff Stulin <br /> The Chair expressed appreciation to the members for taking the time to forward comments on this topic.Members <br /> each took a moment to voice their comments(as shown in Attachment C). The Chair pointed out that these were all <br /> good ideas,which need to be taken seriously,and may become future School Committee agenda items.The member <br /> from Lincoln,pointed out that some of these ideas relate to concerns he will report on at a future meeting related to <br /> his role as liaison to the Advisory Committee.The member from Arlington expressed that the ideas need a context <br /> and need to be folded into the goals process,in conversation with the Superintendent. The member from Dover <br /> noted that the ideas need to be aired immediately to be taken into consideration in the Building Project discussions, <br /> and requested that they be forwarded to the School Building Committee and the Design Team.The Vice Chair <br /> offered to prioritize them with the officers. <br /> 2 <br />