Laserfiche WebLink
They also discussed cost savings anticipated with the truncated schedule, as well as the realistic focus and <br /> attention to contingencies. It was noted that meetings with the Lincoln Planning Board have been <br /> underway since October,2016,and that there are some hurdles still to discuss. It was noted that the good <br /> news of cost savings and a shortened scheduled was not foreseeable, given the delays and the <br /> unpredictability of the approval process along the way. The Chair emphasized that there are many <br /> unknowns in a building project such as this,and there are no guarantees. Good design, flexibility, and <br /> competence of the team were noted as key ingredients. It was pointed out that some items came off the <br /> design, and may be able to be added back in,with the cost savings,but real clarity won't be known until <br /> the costs estimates are put out to bid. The extent of the risk will be known with early packages of two <br /> independent estimates reviewed 3 times. Bob Domnitz, seated in the audience,offered some suggestions <br /> based on his experience as a member of the Lincoln Planning Board. The member from Stow <br /> commended the inclusion of facilities management in the curriculum, as it supports Minuteman's <br /> standing as a cutting-edge school. She also hoped some of the virtual reality material can be brought to <br /> the presentations,as this,too, is cutting-edge. The School Building Committee chair invited all to attend <br /> their meetings, and noted that the next one is scheduled for Monday January 23, 2017 at 5:00 PM in the <br /> Paul Revere Room. It was also noted that some of the details presented dovetail nicely with Admissions <br /> efforts, and that this is very positive, as the major opportunities the project presents for students can be <br /> used as active promotion of the education Minuteman offers its students. <br /> d. Approval of Construction Manager at Risk Contract <br /> Mr. Spalding noted that the School Building Committee has voted to recommend that the School <br /> Committee approve the award of the contract to Gilbane, and that the contract has been reviewed by legal <br /> counsel for both Gilbane and Minuteman. He then read the motion,and the following vote was then <br /> taken: <br /> ACTION 2017#2 <br /> Moved(Spalding) and seconded(DeLuca) <br /> To approve the award of a contract with Gilbane Building Co.,Inc. ("Gilbane")to act as <br /> Construction Manager At Risk in connection with the replacement of the existing high <br /> school building through construction of a new high school facility and related work(the <br /> "Project"), such contract to be in substantially the form presented to this meeting with <br /> such revisions as may be approved by the Chair of the School Building Committee (the <br /> "Contract") <br /> VOTE: <br /> Members in room at time of vote: 11 (Absent: Wayland,Lancaster,Weston,Arlington, Sudbury) <br /> Weighted Vote present: 59.03% <br /> Weight needed: 29.52% <br /> Names of towns opposing or abstaining:None <br /> Final percentage results of vote: 59.03% <br /> Final status of the vote: Passed Unanimously <br /> e. Authorization of School Building Committee Roles and Responsibilities <br /> Mr. Spalding then explained that the next vote is a clarification, outlining the School Building <br /> Committee's role and responsibilities. He confirmed that this was written by counsel, and that it is typical <br /> for Building Committees. He noted that the School Committee has approved the three major contracts, <br /> and because of their meeting schedule,this vote will expedite approval of future amendments to contracts <br /> and payments. He explained the oversight currently in place with payment approvals. He then read the <br /> motion, and the following vote was taken: <br /> 3 <br />