2022-05-16-REC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

3 39 MARRETT ROAD, LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02421 Ms. Battite reminded the Committee that this study came as a result of the failed venture with Minuteman High School. Such considerations that were reviewed during the process included lighting, field reconfiguration, safety, converting fields from natural grass to synthetic turf, site expansion, and public/private partnerships. The demand for organized field use exceeds the Town’s inventory. Excessive use during all seasons has caused stressed conditions at multiple field locations, poor field drainage significantly reduces field time and overburdens fields that drain well, and the user experience can be different at each field due to availability and condition. Dave Pinsonneault, DPW Director, added that the more use on a natural grass field, the quicker the conditions will deteriorate. To preserve the longevity of the fields, it is important to rotate and rest fields, which are luxuries that the Town is unable to implement at this time due to demand. Some of the poorer draining fields include Bowman, Bridge, Clarke, and Center #1. Additional considerations that were reviewed include peak programming (after school/work and weekends), limited lighting on the existing synthetic turf fields, limited real estate, and protected open space. The Committee members will review the study further and submit comments by May 30th prior to the final presentation being given at the June meeting. At this point, a total of ten (10) proposed concepts were reviewed. Mr. Pinsonneault noted that some of these sites are already included in the 5-Year Capital Plan and it is good to know that there are options at the various sites. Kathleen Lenihan, School Committee liaison, recommended putting Harrington B and Harrington C really low on the list since an alternative location for the Lexington Public Schools administrative offices has not been identified. Rick DeAngelis, Chairman of the Recreation Committee, stated that recreation resources are limited and over- utilized and are in need of renovation and upgrading. Lisa O’Brien asked if deficits will remain once the projects are completed and where does the Town have the most demand. Ms. Battite and Mr. DeAngelis reminded the Committee about the presentation that two high school students made several years ago about the need for a cricket field in town. The intent is that issues like this would be adequately addressed through the implementation of this study. Christian Boutwell acknowledged that the use at Lincoln is already being maximized and he would not want to see the field conditions deteriorate prematurely due to additional use. 8. Munroe Centre for the Arts – Cristina Burwell Cristina Burwell, Executive Director of the Munroe Centre for the Arts, was joined by Brian Healy of Brian Healy Architects and Steve Poltorzycki, Co-Chair of the Munroe Centre for the Arts Board of Directors, to review proposed improvements at the site. Site drawings and renderings are attached to the meeting minutes. Munroe was built as a school building back in 1905. The priority is to increase accessibility with the main focus being on the inclusion of an elevator and accessible restrooms. The project would also extend into the recreation land that is located behind the building. The proposed project fits into items identified in the 2020 Community Needs Assessment, such as outdoor events and cultural experiences, and Ms. Burwell wanted to touch base with the Committee to provide an update. Mr. Healy added that planning has been ongoing over the past year. The proposed entry pavilion would be accessible, contain gender neutral bathrooms, and would require parking to be extended. One option being considered is to switch the orientation of the parking lot from east-west to north-south. The project calls for the creation of an amphitheater and the end result is for the Munroe campus to serve multiple purposes. There are currently 41 parking spots and no spaces would be eliminated. The goal is to work in concert with the Committee to improve organization of the campus, enhance safety, clearly identify uses at the park, and improve playability for organized activities. Securing funding and meeting with the abutters to discuss the project are the next steps in the process. There is no budget estimate at this time. Ms. Battite indicated that the Commission on Disability (COD), Building Department, Community Preservation Committee (CPC), and Design Review Team have all seen this presentation. The property is not Article 97 land, but Town