Laserfiche WebLink
29Z <br /> Adjourned Session-1997 Annual Town Meeting cont...-March 26. 1997 <br /> (b) The receipt of new information relating to the project,which indicates that <br /> previous information presented to the Conservation Commission was <br /> inaccurate;or <br /> (c) Changes to the project after completion of the Conservation Commission's <br /> review. <br /> SECTION 9 BECOMES SECTION 11 -NO CHANGE <br /> SECTION 10 BECOMES SECTION 12 -NO CHANGE <br /> Mr.Hamilton summarized five significant changes to the by-law,including changes <br /> to consultant fees, shifting responsibilities to applicants, protected resource areas, <br /> designation of additional interests,and modifying/revoking order of conditions. <br /> 8:24 p.m. Selectman Eddison stated unanimous support of the Board of Selectmen. <br /> Discussion followed. Questions were raised regarding issues around land subject to flooding, <br /> vernal pools,and requirements for notifying abutters. <br /> Anne Ripley,Pr.6,submitted an amendment to change the requirement for a five day advance <br /> notification to abutters to fifteen day advance notification. After discussion and an <br /> explanation by William Hamilton of the Conservation Commission that the 15 day advance <br /> notice would be unworkable,Anne Ripley withdrew her amendment. <br /> Following a voice vote at 8:38 p.m.,the Moderator declared adoption of the motion. 774 <br /> ARTICLE 31: LEGISLATION/TOWN WIDE REFERENDUM VOTE <br /> 8:38 p.m. Selectman Daniel Busa requested that Article 31 be taken up at this time <br /> and asked the Moderator to recognize Stephen Tripi,Pr. 8, for presentation of the <br /> motion. <br /> MOTION: That the Selectmen be and they hereby are authorized to petition <br /> the General court for an act which would require a town-wide referendum vote for <br /> the approval of any fiscal year's operating budget exclusive of line items funded by <br /> enterprise funds, which exceeds the prior fiscal year's operating budget by more <br /> than three percent. <br /> 8:41 p.m. Mr.Tripi presented the article. He commented about the lack of <br /> effectiveness of Proposition 2'/a in the cost of government in Lexington. <br /> He requested that the members support the motion. <br /> 8:44 p.m. Selectman Peter Enrich stated that a majority of the Board of Selectmen <br /> opposed the motion and that it would be an unworkable restraint on <br /> the Town's decisionmaking. --,1 <br /> 8:45 p.m. Paul Lapointe, Chairman of the Appropriation Committee, announced the <br /> Committee was unanimously opposed to the motion. He explained that <br /> sufficient checks and balances existed in the budget process. <br /> 8:48 p.m. Perry Pollins, 14 Peachtree Road and a resident of Pr. 5, spoke from the <br /> balcony in support of the motion. <br /> 8:51 p.m. Charles Shaw,Pr. 1, spoke in support of the motion and requested a roll <br /> call vote. <br />