Laserfiche WebLink
the parking area would impact those calculations and the team needed to review that further. <br /> The team touched on the Energy Analysis to summarize that the original model had a project <br /> load of 355 Kwh with projected 30% energy savings and 19% cost savings over the baseline, <br /> however with the increased square footage the expected load is +/- 386 Kwh with 36% and <br /> 27% savings. It is important to note however that the energy model is not yet fully updated. <br /> An important question was raised as there is a line in the model that is called Misc. Equipment <br /> and accounts for 42% of the load. The design Team was asked to investigate this line and better <br /> break out what "Misc. Equipment" represents. <br /> It was discussed that a good deal of this may be all the dispatch and radio equipment, however <br /> if it was found to be due to the towns IT Infrastructure that too should be flagged. <br /> Also requested were the 87/60 values, which the design team stated they would not have until <br /> the Energy Analysis was complete at the end of the DD phase. <br /> Once all DD phase documents are complete (1/10/22) it will take approx. three weeks to get the <br /> completed energy model. <br /> Needs for DD Completion <br /> The items that will make up the end of DD phase were discussed and will be available in two <br /> phases. <br /> After 1/10/22 Deadline <br /> Red List Database DD status report <br /> LEED/Lex Checklist updated thru Design Development <br /> 100% Design Development Drawings <br /> +/- 3 weeks thereafter: <br /> Completed / Updated Energy Model <br /> Updated 87/60 values <br /> DD Phase Cost estimate <br /> It was discussed that information be shared with the Sustainable Lexington Committee so that <br /> they could review these current issues at their next meeting as well. <br /> The next PBC meeting is to be scheduled for 1/13/22. <br /> Once the DD estimate is available and the tentative Select Board Meeting is determined for <br /> February, we will schedule a PBC meeting for review of the estimate and a recommendation for <br /> the Select Board. <br /> PV Canopies <br /> Tecton began to look at the design of PV canopies over the parking area with a goal to make the <br /> canopies light, airy and less obtrusive then what PV canopies look like in other areas of town. <br /> Several renderings were shown along with some precedent images of built examples. <br /> Among the noted characteristics, the design is flat, has a small edge profile and is a touch <br /> higher than usual (24ft). The canopies were also shown with only about 75% coverage, thus <br /> allowing some light and weather to pass through. <br /> The height was discussed and the concept was to try and keep these a little higher and less in <br /> view, other canopies in town are approx. 14 feet at the low point and approximately 17 ft at the <br /> high end. <br /> It was noted that Fire Department garage doors are 14 feet. <br /> Part of the height logic was tying it to a part of the police station building visually. <br /> It was asked if the pitch made a difference and it was stated that flat versus 3 or 5 degrees <br /> does not seem to have a big impact on production, although flat and near flat panels do not <br /> shed snow particularly well. <br />