Laserfiche WebLink
P/7 <br /> p <br /> We beg to acknowledge your letter of May 14 and answer your two <br /> questions as follows: <br /> 1. We do not know who the members of the Capital Outlay <br /> Committee are. The writer talked with Charlie Ferguson <br /> yesterday on the telephone and he has not appointed the <br /> Committee. <br /> 2. We are certainly in favor of having a policy and plan rela- <br /> tive to long-range financial expenditures but rather feel <br /> that such plans and policies are as property developed by <br /> the Appropriation Committee as by the Board of Selectmen. <br /> We would be very glad to meet with your Board at any time and discuss <br /> a long-range policy and ways of effectively following it. We think <br /> that it is perhaps more difficult to follow a policy of this kind than <br /> it is to initially formulate it. <br /> You raise the question of "setting aside a reasonable amount each year <br /> in a fund which would be available for the purpose of easing future <br /> bonded indebtedness and thus stabilizing the tax rate within reason." <br /> We would be glad to discuss this with you if it is perfectly legal <br /> under some State Statute, and we will look into this latter phase. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> S George Emery <br /> C airman - Selectmen." <br /> It was suggested that when the various sub-committees meet with <br /> the department heads that they suggest that the department appropria- <br /> tions made for March should be more than adequate to carry them for <br /> 1949 without additional transfers. <br /> The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> V)' 0i3N1/1_. <br /> Secretary <br />