Laserfiche WebLink
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2022 ATM& STMs 2022-1 & -2 <br /> The funds available for these State supplements are taken from a surcharge on the transaction fees <br /> charged by the State's Registries of Deeds. The FY2020 Massachusetts Budget provided for increases in <br /> registry fee surcharges which fund the CPATF. As no further increase in the rates is currently projected, <br /> the supplements will vary from year to year with the level of activity at those Registries. For some <br /> previous years, the State had allocated additional funds to the CPATF if the State's prior-year's budget <br /> ended with a surplus. However, the State's budgets did not always end with a surplus. (See the footnotes <br /> to the above table.) <br /> The Lexington CPF receives the annual receipts from our local surcharge, the State supplement, and <br /> interest on the balance in our Town's CPF. Under the statute, 10% of the total received each year is <br /> allocated to each of the following categories: Community Housing, Historic Resources, and Open Space. <br /> The remaining 70%of this income may be spent for any of these categories or for Recreation. Funds may <br /> be accrued from year to year and are available for debt service on previously approved projects. <br /> A CPA-funded project can only be brought to Town Meeting for action through recommendation by the <br /> CPC whose membership, in our Town, is prescribed in the Code of Lexington as follows: <br /> § 29-23A. There is hereby established a Community Preservation Committee pursuant to Section <br /> 5 of Chapter 44B of the General Laws (the "Act") consisting of nine members. The Board of <br /> Selectmen shall appoint three members of the Community Preservation Committee and the <br /> following bodies shall each select one of its members for membership on the Community <br /> Preservation Committee: the Conservation Commission, the Planning Board, the Recreation <br /> Committee,the Historical Commission,the Housing Authority, and the Housing Partnership. <br /> Town Meeting can only approve, reduce the funding, or disapprove a project; it cannot change the <br /> purpose. Town Counsel has provided an opinion that Town Meeting can change the funding mechanism <br /> for a given project (cash or debt). This Committee gives our recommendation on each of the projects put <br /> before Town Meeting. <br /> See the report of the CPC for information on how Lexington has spent from the CPF since 2007. <br /> The projected available CPF cash is not a limitation on what the CPC can recommend to Town Meeting <br /> for spending approval. The CPA can—and often does—include debt financing which is then paid over the <br /> term of the borrowing using the CPF. This Committee has always stated that cash funding should be the <br /> first preference. However, (1)Any such debt should be for as short a term as practical, with and payment <br /> front-end loaded, as practical, after considering the funding projected for the CPF (not including any State <br /> supplemental funds) over at least the next 10 years; and (2) Such debt should be approved only after <br /> consideration of potential future projects that might come before the CPC for consideration which would <br /> require funds beyond those allocated to the three, mandatory reserves for Open Space, Historic <br /> Resources, and Community (Affordable)Housing. <br /> The debt service is an obligation borne by the CPF throughout the term of those instruments—whether <br /> short-term financing (i.e., notes, such as a Bond Anticipation Note [BAN]) and/or long-term financing <br /> (i.e., a bond). It is the Town's practice that each year's debt service will be paid from any funds remaining <br /> in the reserve category under which that project was eligible—whether or not initially financed from that <br /> reserve—before use of other available funds. In subsequent years,the CPC recommends to Town Meeting <br /> those obligatory debt-service-payment appropriations. (See Article 10(m).) <br /> One approach that provides flexibility in deciding how much, if any, CPF cash should be applied up front <br /> for a large project is to defer that decision by initially issuing a BAN for a term of one year or less for the <br /> full amount of the project. (A BAN typically carries an interest rate that is below even the relatively low <br /> rates paid on the Town's bonds.)When a BAN matures, a decision can be made whether to use CPF cash <br /> to reduce the total for which a longer-term bond would then be issued. Doing so gives the Town a better <br /> idea of how much CPF cash should be held in anticipation of the next—and later—years' demands upon <br /> the CPF. This mechanism has been used in the past, and this Committee expects it to be proposed in the <br /> future for other large projects. <br /> The CPC carefully husbands available funds, and this year has recommended only those projects which <br /> can be funded with current income and funds on hand, after debt service and its administrative costs. The <br /> 9 <br />