Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
X66 <br /> transferred when the price is known. <br /> Mr. Parrish then reported that he and IIugh Chapin of the Capital <br /> Expenditures Committee had discussed the need for more coordina— <br /> tion between the two committees. He arks asked what the Appropri— <br /> ation Committee thought of the idea that the Appropriation <br /> Coua,Attee would not consider any capital expenditure items until <br /> they had been passed on by the Capital Expenditures CouLlittee. <br /> It was suggested that a procedure be bet up whereby aay item of <br /> capital expenditures presented to the Appropriation Committee <br /> would not be considered until that item}had been considered by <br /> the Capital Expenditures Commit dee. Requests to the Appropriation <br /> Committee should be accompanied by a letter from the CEC stating <br /> their recommendations, including a probable cost i;i dollars and <br /> a recommendation as to whether the item should be bonded or put <br /> on the tax rate. It was pointed out by Mr. Parrish that this <br /> policy would cover primarily requests which come in after the CEC <br /> has made its report. It is hoped that this policy would enforce <br /> efforts to get various departments to present their capital <br /> expenditure requests before the CEC makes its report. <br /> Meeting ddjourned at 10:00 p.m. <br /> r - <br />