Laserfiche WebLink
• ARTICLE 12: Accessibility of the Old Reservoir. C Welch will report when K <br /> Simmons has returned. No Vote Taken <br /> • ARTICLE 13: School Technology Program. R Pawliczek will meet with S Bottan <br /> next week and report back to AC. No Vote Taken <br /> • ARTICLE 15: Stabilization Fund. P Hamburger will do the write-up. No funds are <br /> being sought at this time. No Vote Taken <br /> • ARTICLE 16: Retirement Board. General discussion surrounding the granting of a <br /> COLA which may be in excess of the regional cost of living increase. J Ryan <br /> explained that the maximum COLA will be 3% on the first$ 12,000 of pension <br /> allowance, or a maximum increase of$360. There are 226 retirees who receive an <br /> annual pension allowance of$12,000 or less. The current year's COLA was set at <br /> 1.3%(warrant is in error at 2.1%). The additional cost for a 3%vs. a 1.3% Coal is <br /> approximately $46,000. The value of the Retirement Board portfolio was $77 million <br /> at the end of 1999. A Levine and E Michelson will do the write-up. No Vote Taken <br /> • ARTICLE 22: By-Law Amendment-Appropriation Committee. P Hamburger will <br /> write-up. Committee in favor. NoVoteTaken <br /> • ARTICLE 25: Use of Funds to Reduce Tax Rate. P Hamburger will write-up. No <br /> Vote Taken. <br /> • C Welch discussed the progress of the Library Trustees fund raising efforts. Since <br /> July 1999 they have received pledges of$1.2 million. <br /> • D Brown distributed and a discussion followed on her research in to town <br /> comparisons (see handout). Difficult to compare one community to another. Attempt <br /> will be made to simply state the facts and let the reader come to their own <br /> conclusions. <br /> • C Welch distributed information regarding the Recreation Fund(balance sheet as of <br /> 12/31/99, FY 99 recreation revenues and Retained Earnings as of June 30, 1999, <br /> Income Statement, June 30, 1999). Discussion about possible PILOT, how are <br /> indirects calculated, is the$75,000 too high, too low?What is a reasonable amount to <br /> carry as a retained earnings amount when other tax-supported issues are not being <br /> funded? C Welch will attempt to get an accounting of the indirect costs incurred by <br /> the DPW from B Gilbert. <br /> • MOTION: To Adjourn <br /> Ac02.17.00 <br />