Laserfiche WebLink
* S Nablo stated that he felt this issue needed to be discussed by Town Meeting. <br /> * R Borghesani is finding it difficult to connect the incase in equipment and technology <br /> with a possible reduction in staff. <br /> * W Dailey stated that if the DARE program were to be cut it would not be a political cut. <br /> * Ambulance service was the next topic of discussion. W Dailey made a case for retaining <br /> the ambulance service provided. The fire fighters have been good in the sense that they <br /> have bargained the minimum manning issue, their salaries are under control. The Town <br /> has very low number of fire fighters per thousand population. If the ambulance service <br /> were to be privatized it would mean the elimination of eight to ten fire fighters thereby <br /> making our ratio of fire fighters to thousand of population even more extreme. The <br /> ambulance service is one of the services that the citizens care very much about. <br /> * J Pagett stated that she found the salary freeze to be very troublesome. <br /> * S Nablo told W Dailey that he as an individual felt the BOS needed to take more of <br /> a leadership role in dealing with these issues. <br /> * G Burnell stated the support from the AC for the report as prepared by T. Michael <br /> Brown, of February, 1993. The BOS and Town Meeting appear to be against the <br /> privatization of the ambulance service. <br /> * DPW Equipment was discussed in depth. <br /> * P Lapointe discussed the need to protect the infrastructure and that we are creating a <br /> debt service need for the next three years with the short term borrowing. Paul expressed <br /> a reluctance to replace equipment in a division which might be privatized. A study of <br /> privatizing opportunities should be completed prior to making purchases. <br /> * K Dookes indicated that the CEC supports $ 650,000 for this article. <br /> * R Souza reiterated her earlier comments that we should perhaps only purchase the <br /> critical needs. <br /> * Wage freeze was discussed by W Dailey as well as members of the AC <br /> * G Burnell stated that the AC will continue to pursue the privatization issue where it is <br /> felt that the private sector can provide the service more economically than the public <br /> sector ( ie: janitorial services, ambulance, cemetery). <br /> * P Lapoine felt that the privatization needs to be studied more in depth with the report <br /> being available in time for the formation of the FY 96 budget requests. <br /> * C Coughlin told W Dailey that she feels a reluctance on the part of the BOS for <br /> privatization as they will equate to layoffs. <br /> * W Dailey stated that he will have a liaison between the BOS and AC on the privatization <br /> issue. <br /> * Stabilization Fund is currently receiving luke warm support from the BOS and will <br /> perhaps be IP. It certainly has a place but is not currently receiving much support. <br /> * G Burnell then asked the AC if they supported the BOS budget or wished to make their <br /> own amendments. The following amendments were presented. <br /> * MOTION to accept resolution of SC budget with BOS at $ 34,923,877. <br /> PASSED: MAJORITY (8/1) JP <br /> * MOTION to amend DPW Expenses (3000) by $ 84,786 <br /> PASSED: MAJORITY (7/2) JP,MM <br /> * General discussion of Police sector patrol. No motion made. <br /> * MOTION to reaffirm AC vote on ambulance privatization with a possible savings of <br /> $ 400,000.General discussion followed. G Burnell stressed need to be able to support the <br />