Laserfiche WebLink
* Contact with LEA expires August 31, 1995. The contract calls for no increase <br /> in FY 94 , with a 3.1% increases scheduled for FY 95. <br /> * General discussion of the classroom shortage in accordance with the handout <br /> distributed by J. Young. The possibility of using portable classrooms was <br /> discussed. J. Young indicated that he didn't think that was a viable solution <br /> due to the fact that the room requirements vary from year to year and school to school. <br /> * Middle schools and high school are filled to capacity at the present time <br /> * S. Nablo suggested that some historical information be supplied due to the fact <br /> that the enrollment at the high school was as high as 1900 and is now at 1300 <br /> therefore how rats it he filled? <br /> * M.O'Sullivan brought up subject of portable v Hastings re-opening. J. Young <br /> estimated the cost of each portable to be in the area of $ 100K or $ 1.6M <br /> to meet all the projected classroom requirements. <br /> * General discussion followed as to staffing levels for principal, secretary, <br /> custodial staff at the Hastings v expansion of each school. <br /> * S. Nablo asked why the apparent discrepancy between the increase in enrollment <br /> and the tremendous increase in classrooms required. J. Young responded that <br /> it was due in part to the reclaiming of classroom space for specialties such <br /> as music and art. <br /> * General discussion on class size. Currently there are two elementary classes <br /> greater than 26, projected to be 12 next year, and 30 in fy 96 if Hastings <br /> is not re-opened. <br /> * General discussion of special education and the mandates forced upon the system <br /> * S. Nablo asked if there had been any selective redistricting in order to <br /> minimize the larger classes. J. Young indicated that it was being done this year <br /> to a limited degree and the problems associated with doing so. <br /> * G. Burnell posed questions to J. Oberteuffer regarding negotiations over pay <br /> and benefits. Response was that the SC and BOS need to get together. There is too much <br /> emphasis placed on Town/School parity when parity should be with other <br /> communities for similar positions <br /> * J. Oberteuffer indicated that he thought that an override would be placed before the <br /> voters. With respect to negotiations he felt that the SC attempted to minimize costs <br /> as much as possible in dealing with the various bargaining groups. <br /> * P. Lapointe asked if there was a similar plan for the needs of the two <br /> middle schools and the highs school to which the response was no. <br /> * R. Borghesani asked about privatization and user fees. Fees are maximized out presently <br /> and the only possible place for privatization would be in the custodial and <br /> nursing areas, neither of which are being discussed presently <br /> * J. Oberteuffer discussed the formation of a school revenue committee and the <br /> possibility of hiring a part time grant writer. <br /> * Level of funding for the school department, as compared to other systems, <br /> to be done by way of a survey to be developed by J. Ryan. <br /> * G. Burnell summarized major areas and assigned responsibility to report to the <br /> full committee. <br /> School: Hastings, Ed Reform, School Choice,Negotiations, Health Insurance <br /> Town: Capital, Street Lights, Drainage, Health Insurance, Privatization <br />