1990-06-12-AC-MIN.pdf - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

contract tonight with an agreement to continue with further negotiations to continue and that he didn't feel that the teachers would negotiate any further due to the fact that they/ would have nothing to gain. When asked fora date and an amount for the "712 budget iie indicated that he could simply pick a number out of the air due primarily to the fact that he may have to consult with 40i0+ teachers all of whom '+f'i'ould be allowed to provide input. ai}.i ij L. Gilson expressed con: rr over be11g pro-active vs reactive a d the .2"'1.C- not being afforded tie opportunity to discuss the contract's financial ramifications with the Committee. The same 141f1me. tJ were expressed by all the A.C. members. P. Geiger J{_-.•..-+ � the dates 1, (�ii 7�.1.1Y=�•{ (, r/i r.�-• L_ _ P. recoun!_ed of budge.tat: y submission this past year, Dec. 23 Dec. 28 and so on with there being constant revisions end updates. The upcoming near will more tedious. 1 with the Committee Jira very receptive both teacher and parent input. J. Pagett expressed concern over the fixed i red costs that will be built in simple by signing the contract. P. Geiger stated that adjustments dIusj7eltb h !ll have to be made. The Committee will have to deal with the problem of cutting personnel and will need the support of the other major boards during this hrs reriod. These adjustments willnot - li js+ be rflade until October at the _ar i : .3 i_. J. Pagett e' .reJsez concern tl:t L. Geiger will be left with limited lej managerial ability. P. Hamburg requested the Capital budget early. N. t attin stated that it was good to see the dialogue and hoped that it would continue with representation front, both the Selectmen and School Committee. ee. P. Geiger requested support for the School Committee from al' the b o7Us durinu these difficult times. A general discussion of the previous topics continued after P. Geiger had left the meeting.