Laserfiche WebLink
1r <br /> Reply from Mr . Holt, Moderator, the Committee <br /> had been discharged. <br /> The amain. motion for Indefinite Postponement was <br /> presented and carried for Indefinite '.Postpone- <br /> menti„„ . 10:11 P.M. <br /> ARTICLE -23. ,:; Mr.`, Fischer of School Committee'moves for <br /> Indefinite 'Postponement.:'"' <br /> Indefinite Postponement carried at 10:12 P.M. <br /> ARTICLE 27. Selectman Mr. Ferguson moves to take up Article 27, <br /> Mr. Duffy,. Chairman of Planning Board, offers the <br /> following: <br /> Voted that the Town amend the Lexington Zoning By- <br /> Law as follows: By inserting after Section 3, <br /> C. 1 Districts, Paragraph 30, a new paragraph <br /> which shallread, as follows: <br /> "30 (a. ) Upon the easterly side of Pleasant <br /> Street beginning at a point 100 feet southerly <br /> from the intersection of the Concord Turnpike <br /> extending 150 feet along Pleasant Street and <br /> of a depth of 200 feet throughout." <br /> Mr. Duffy readsreport of Planning Board. <br /> REPORT OF THE PLANNING BOARD <br /> ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO <br /> ZONING BY-LAW RELATIVE <br /> TO HENRY. S. MOODY <br /> PETITION <br /> Acting upon the petition of Henry S. Moody to amend <br /> the Lexington Zoning. By-Law and Map by changing the <br /> parcel of land upon the easterly side of Pleasant Street <br /> beginning at a point 100 feet southerly from the inter- <br /> section of. the. Concord Turnpike extending 150 feet along <br /> Pleasant Street and a depth of 200 feet throughout; from <br /> an R. 1to a C., l District, the Planning Board has, in <br /> accordance with the provisions, of _the._Zoning By-Law, held <br /> a duly advertised hearing and reports to the town as <br /> follows: <br /> The Board is of the opinion that at the present time <br /> no need exists for a business zone in this part of the <br /> town and it does not believe that such a zone would add <br /> to the general welfare or convenience of the citizens of <br /> Lexington. Whatever the future business requirements may <br /> become., along the new Concord Highway, there are at least <br /> four parties who have withheld petitions for zoning changes <br /> in this general area, pending action by the State <br /> Legislature relative to the regulation of business along <br /> this road. <br /> The Board therefore recommends that this proposed <br /> amendment be not adopted, at least until the State bill <br /> is acted upon. <br /> J. HENRY_.DUFFY. <br /> Lexington ROLAND B. GREELEY . <br /> LESTER F. ELLIS_ <br /> Planning SEI17ON A ROBINSON <br /> July 22, 1935 Board EDWARD W. KIMBALL <br /> General discussion., Messer: Cotton, Ferguson, Cutter, <br /> Ryder, Kimball, Hutchinson, Borden, Worthen and <br /> Lamont. <br /> A rising vote to amend the Lexington Zoning By-Law <br /> taken as follows: <br />