Laserfiche WebLink
442 1 <br /> a <br /> cD <br /> ce) <br /> at the junction of Bedford Street and Valley Road , <br /> approximately opposite North Hancock Street , and opposite <br /> the business block known as Crescent Manor . <br /> Pursuant to the Smith petition and following <br /> fourteen days published notice given in the Lexington <br /> Tines - Minute -'Man, issue of July 4th , 1930 , and to some <br /> sixty notices forwarded by mil to resident citizens within <br /> an area designated by the Planning Board as affected by <br /> the pro osition to make the change petitic' ned for , <br /> the Planning Board held a hearing under date of July 21 , <br /> 1930 . Five citizens recorded themselves as apuearing at <br /> and for th s hearing . <br /> No i1:a fedi ate demand for further general business in <br /> th L s locality was expressed at the hearing . The Crescent <br /> Manor buiding nearly opposite has contained two vacant <br /> stores for some time past , both of which wou �_.d probably have <br /> been availed of had there been any real demand for business <br /> at that point . It was said that the stores were small , <br /> but they could undoubtedly be enlarged more cheaply and <br /> satisfactorily than new stores could be built . It was <br /> stated by Ir . Smith that he had had an offer for business <br /> but did not know what kind of business it was to be used for ; <br /> fro'n another source it was learned that the probable <br /> intention was to establish thereon another filling station . <br /> There having been evidenced rio demand for business thereat <br /> of a general nature , is there any demand for a filling station <br /> at that point? There are two filling stations a little <br /> less than a mile to the sou-Eh , on Bedford Street , to be <br /> exact , nine tenths of a mile, and there is another filling <br /> stati : n seven tenths of a mile to the north . <br /> It is felt that there is no real need for another <br /> filling station at the point under consideration . The <br /> estab + ishent of any filling station tends to slow UP <br /> traffic and increase the danger , due to automobiles swinging111 <br /> out from the traffic lines to the filling stati .. in and again <br /> swinging to join the traffic lines . <br /> Of the four corner properties at the junction of <br /> Bedford Street , North Hancock Street and Valley Road , one <br /> corner is already occupied for business - the Crescent ;Aanor , <br /> which existed at the time of the adoption of our first <br /> Zoning By-law . Accordingly , in the original Zoning By - Taw <br /> a business zone was created at that point , extending two <br /> hundred feet northerly along Bedford Street from its <br /> junction with North Hancock Street , and two hundred fifty <br /> feet easterly along the northerly side of. North Hancock <br /> Street . Mr . E . W . Ormond ' s grocery store is located within <br /> this area , on the northerly side of North Hancock Street . <br /> It was then felt that this aggregate frontage of four <br /> hundred fifty feet furnished opportunity for all the <br /> business that would be required in that locality for <br /> many years to come . If this status is to be changed and <br /> if thet' e is need for bringinu in any of the additional <br /> corner properties , the Planning Board , in considering <br /> the subject , felt tint all of the remaining corners should <br /> be brought in . It would be unjust to change the status of any of <br /> the additional corners w thout changing all of them . The <br /> reason for this is obvious - the creation of any addition <br /> to the business zone at the opposite side of Bedford Street <br /> at this point will naturally depreciate values of residential <br /> property adjoining , consequently all should be treated alike <br /> and all have the opportunity to enter the business zone <br /> if any have that opportunity , provided always that there Ls <br /> demand for the change . To throw properties into a business <br /> zone without a demand therefor means that the " e would be <br /> no use of such pro2erties for business , consequently no <br /> increase in values arising from business uses to offset <br /> the depreciated values of those properties for residential <br />