2021-12-20-CONCOM-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Project: construction of 3 additions, landscaping, invasive plant removal, and wetland replication within 100-foot buffer zone to Isolated Vegetated Wetlands Documentation Submitted.- - ubmitted:— Stormwater Report; Prepared for: Lexington Housing Authority; Prepared by: Samiotes Consultants, Inc.; Stamped and signed by: Stephen R. Garvin, PE Civil No. 42772; Date: 11/30/2021; — Site plans; Sheet EX-1 "Existing Conditions Plan", Sheet EX-2 "Existing Conditions Plan", Sheet C-1.1 "Demo & Soil Erosion Plan", Sheet C-2.1 "Drainage Plan", Sheet C- 3.1 "Civil Details", Sheet L1.1 "Landscape Layout& Materials Plan", Sheet L1.2 "Landscape Planting Plan", Sheet L1.3 "Landscape Site Planting Plan", Sheet L2.1 "Site Details and Sections", "Proposed Wetland Replication Plan"; — Notice of Intent application and attachments; Prepared by: Samiotes Consultants, Inc.; Date: 11/30/2021; — Engineering Comments; From: Marissa Liggiero, Engineering; Subject: 10 Vynebrooke Village NOI Engineering Comments; Date: 12/15/2021; Ms. Michelle Kayserman, Samiotes Consultants,presented before the Commission. Ms. Ladd stated that the asphalt apron off the turnaround and next to the community building is huge. Ms. Ladd asked if some of that impervious surface could be removed. Ms. Annie Steele, project architect, responded that the size may be necessary for emergency vehicles to access; however, she will take a look at this for the next meeting. Ms. Ladd followed up stating that an action like reducing pavement in this area could go a long way towards providing additional mitigation. It was asked if a cross section of the proposed mitigation site was provided. Ms. Kayserman responded that she doesn't believe this information was provided but will submit it as part of the supplemental information for the next meeting. It was noted that no runoff attenuation is being provided for the new walkway in the front of the building and this will need to be included within the stormwater management report. The applicant does not need to manage that specific stormwater; however, they could increase the size of the rain garden to capture additional roof runoff from another part of the building. On a motion by Ms. Dohan and seconded by Mr. Hamilton, the Commission voted 7-0 by roll call vote to continue the hearing to the January 24, 2022 meeting at the applicant's request. Record of vote as follows: Duke Bitsko—Aye Kevin Beuttell —Aye Alex Dohan—Aye Ruth Ladd—Aye David Langseth—Aye Holly Samuels —Aye Phil Hamilton—Aye