|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2021-07-01-SBFRC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Stone Building Feasability/Reuse Committee, Ad hoc - SBFRC
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-07-01-SBFRC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2021 3:53:06 PM
Creation date
11/29/2021 3:53:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - SBFRC - Ad hoc Stone Building Feasibility/Reuse Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ad Hoc Stone Building Feasibility/Reuse Committee (SBFRC) <br /> Town of Lexington, MA <br /> RECEIVED <br /> MEETING MINUTES 2021 29 �� ', 1�5 1pii7"i <br /> TOWN CLERK <br /> July 1, 2021 • 8:00am LEXINGTON MA <br /> Attending: Jaclyn Anderson, Cristina Burwell, Jeff Howry, Carolyn Goldstein, Doug Lucente <br /> (Select Board Liaison), Melinda Nasardinov, Lester Savage <br /> Absent: Claire Feingold Thoryn (Cary Library Trustees Liaison), Anne Grady, Mark Manasas, <br /> Meg Muckenhoupt (Appropriations Comm. Liaison), Paul Smyke <br /> Community Observers: Elaine Ashton <br /> Recording Secretary: Cristina Burwell <br /> This meeting was held in the Estabrook Room of Cary Hall, as well as hosted online, and <br /> began at 8:09am. The minutes were approved as motioned by Carolyn, seconded by Melinda, <br /> and approved by all. There were no public comments at this time. <br /> The meeting began with a brief discussion about how committee members have internalized <br /> "what success might look like" after listening to public comments, and merging that with their <br /> own thoughts (including potential users, programming, and revenue). Some member <br /> observations included: <br /> • The SB can be an institution for both Lexingtonians as well as neighboring towns via <br /> its proximity to the bike path. Access to the play area directly off the bike path en route <br /> to the SB, with the potential to have public restrooms would be a draw. <br /> • It would be nice to have foot traffic for one purpose with the secondary purpose of <br /> interacting with the building to grow appreciation of its, and related, history. <br /> • Our considerations are multifunctional: building occupancy that makes the most use of <br /> the space, programming that benefits the community, and budgeting that provides for <br /> ongoing maintenance of the building. <br /> • Whatever entity takes control must have an endowment (also discussed, that this is <br /> not the case with similar examples). <br /> • Interest in having the building open to multiple users for a variety of programming, and <br /> that we will need to perhaps frame the programming a bit better so that appropriate <br /> groups can be selected. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.