|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2021-05-06-SBFRC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Stone Building Feasability/Reuse Committee, Ad hoc - SBFRC
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-05-06-SBFRC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2021 3:48:47 PM
Creation date
11/29/2021 3:48:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - SBFRC - Ad hoc Stone Building Feasibility/Reuse Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIVED <br /> Ad Hoc Stone Building Feasibility/Reuse Committee <br /> g 2021 IIO +, ��Or Ipui °m <br /> Town of Lexington, MA TOWN <br /> CLERK <br /> May 6, 20218:00 AM LEXINGTON MA <br /> MINUTES <br /> 1. Roll Call & Reading of Statement on Use of Virtual Meetings <br /> Attending: Jill Hai (Select Board Liaison), Cristina Burwell, Lester Savage, Anne <br /> Grady, Melinda Nasardinov, Mark Manasas, Paul Smyke, Carolyn Goldstein, Jeff Howry <br /> (Chair), Meg Muckenhoupt (Appropriations Committee Liaison), Claire Feingold Thoryn <br /> (Cary Library Trustees Liaison) <br /> Absent: Devin Marks <br /> Recording Secretary: Cristina Burwell <br /> Community Observers: Jaclyn Anderson, Elaine Ashton, Sabine/Ken Clark, Hien <br /> Nguyen <br /> 2. Approval of Minutes (April 15 & 26, 2021) <br /> 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS - none <br /> 4. DISCUSSION OF 4/29 PUBLIC FORUM <br /> a. Review of process (for repeating next time) <br /> There was an overall feeling that the process went well, and the format <br /> Likewise. It was felt that there was a good number of people (about 50 at each <br /> session) as well as a wide variety of thoughtful responses. The format seemed <br /> to go well, as well as the length. Claire's moderation was lovely and seamless, <br /> and the timekeeping helpful - with much thanks to Melinda's preparation. <br /> b. Review of public comments (forum, and emails) <br /> Carolyn and Paul have taken committee emails (through 4/28) as well as forum <br /> comments and synthesized them into a document (see attached) that called out <br /> both themes that were identified in the public comments, as well as other ideas <br /> and some issues/concerns that surfaced. Mark has been able to assemble all <br /> the committee's emails into one document that they assemble into a master <br /> document, and will continue to do this as we receive more emails. <br /> It was noted that it will be helpful for the committee to be aware that the <br /> number of responses for one idea is not necessarily the larger community view, <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.