Laserfiche WebLink
the sentiments expressed at the most recent Select Board Meeting, there appeared to be no objection <br /> to the revised proposal at this time. <br /> Nick updated the Committee on progress with bulk purchasing initiatives through MPAC. He noted that <br /> if the NAC proposal was not considered until Spring 2022 Town Meeting the MPAC initiative may be <br /> decided by that point. He also noted that if the NAC proposal was pushed to consideration by Town <br /> Meeting during the Spring of 2022,the end date of the proposed phaseout may also have to be pushed <br /> back. <br /> Dan asked if any members had concerns about the current text of the proposal. No members voiced <br /> concerns. Dan therefore noted that, in his opinion, there was no reason to re-open discussion of it <br /> further. He observed that certain members of the public and certain landscapers would likely not be <br /> satisfied with the NAC proposal and that this was to be expected. However, he noted that the <br /> Committee had made significant efforts to engage with all participants and consider opposing views in <br /> arriving at the current draft. <br /> After discussion the following motion was made: <br /> Motion <br /> Dan made a motion that the Committee confirm the NAC proposal as complete for presentation to the <br /> Select Board and Town Meeting.The Motion was seconded by Nick and following a roll call vote,the <br /> motion was approved unanimously. <br /> Vicki suggested that, ahead of the Select Board and Town meeting, the Committee should consider <br /> putting together a question-and-answer document to proactively distribute before the Town Meeting <br /> which would anticipate the expected push back from landscapers. <br /> Procedurally it was agreed that the proposed Q and A be considered by the Committee at its next <br /> meeting. <br /> 4. New Business <br /> The Committee then discussed potential new initiatives that the NAC may focus upon going forward. <br /> Dan noted that, administratively, the Town did not currently have an effective process for receiving and <br /> dealing with noise-related complaints.There are now 4 Town agencies who receive complaints. <br /> However, there is no uniformity in how complaints are dealt with, no ticketing system for tracking <br /> complaints and no standard system for informing residents how to make complaints. <br /> Dan suggested that a new NAC initiative may involve assisting in the development of a streamlined <br /> system for the intake,ticketing and resolution of noise complaints. <br /> He also noted that Belmont had recently implemented a bylaw which established an overall absolute <br /> noise restriction on all activity in that Town.This would obviously require accurate noise measuring <br /> tools for enforcement. Implementing this would require a substantial rewriting of the Noise Bylaw. It <br />