Laserfiche WebLink
think that appropriate development can lend itself to regional solutions to traffic and <br /> environmental quality, such as redevelopment conducive to transit use, which creates greater <br /> opportunity and incentive for the development of regional transit. Our vision and goals are <br /> characterized by qualified optimism that the town can prevent unwanted development and can <br /> promote desired development. <br /> This is not to say that our group's position should be characterized as "pro-development." There <br /> has been much concern expressed in our discussions about the kind of new development that has <br /> occurred in town over the last decade. Few examples exist of new development which is widely <br /> viewed to have a positive effect on the town. The particular phenomena of"tear-downs" and <br /> "mansionization" are generally viewed as having a negative impact on neighborhoods and being <br /> threatening to the town character. It is with only guarded optimism that our group embraces the <br /> idea of managed growth. <br /> Our group's support for new development is first of all imited: it must directly address <br /> community needs and priorities. New development projects should be for the following <br /> purposes: <br /> • Providing senior housing, subsidized affordable housing, or other specified alternative <br /> housing options; <br /> • Supporting and strengthening the economic viability and vitality of the town center and <br /> satellite centers; <br /> • Supporting the formation of one or more higher density neighborhoods along public <br /> transportation routes as part of a long-range effort to reduce automobile dependency. <br /> Secondly, our support for new development is conditional: it must be carried on within the <br /> constraints defined by our goals for open space preservation, limiting traffic congestion, <br /> improving environmental quality, and retaining town character (even though that character may <br /> be difficult to precisely define). Furthermore, given our strong desire to protect open space, we <br /> propose that most new development be redevelopment within the existing town build-out and <br /> infrastructure, and that new development on the town's remaining vacant land be limited <br /> according to the constraints and for the purposes outlined above. <br /> The means to manage new development successfully will be through town zoning by-laws. We <br /> urge the town to make changes necessary in current zoning and regulatory structures to prevent <br /> the kind of development that we don't want, and to encourage desired development. <br /> Reaching agreement that "managed growth" is preferable to "zero growth"was fairly easy, but <br /> the real choices that the town will face regarding what is appropriate development are full of <br /> potential conflict and complexity. Critical choices include the following: <br /> • Open space. How much of the town's remaining vacant land should be protected from <br /> development? Our group calls for the town to protect much of the town's vacant land, but <br /> Managing Growth-7 <br />