|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2000-06-12 Managing Growth Development and Open Space Working Group.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Managing Growth: Development and Open Space Working Group
>
Reports
>
2000-06-12 Managing Growth Development and Open Space Working Group.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2022 3:35:14 PM
Creation date
9/7/2021 6:14:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2000
Author or Source
Managing Growth: Development and Open Sp
Keywords or Subject
Managing Growth Development and Open Space Working Group 2020 Vision Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITIZENS'S SURVEY notax <br /> xfer fee-2 <br /> prop tax levy- 1 <br /> The questionnaire results are in, (questionnaire both -2 <br /> attached). Altogether,I received 38 responses to the <br /> questionnaire.20 of those responses were from Town Open Space Q4: <br /> Meeting Members Association [TMMA] e-mail list 0.0%- 1 <br /> recipients, 12 of them were from my neighborhood [I 0.5%-2 <br /> am calling it the Pine Meadows neighborhood,for 5.0%-2 <br /> lack of a better name],and 6 of them were from the 7.0+%- 1 <br /> Merriam Hill Association e-mail list recipients. [median-0.5/5.0] <br /> I am not a statistician,but I think it is safe to say that Traffic Ql: <br /> this is far too small a sample set to draw any not important- 1 <br /> meaningful conclusions from.However,I did receive somewhat imp. - 1 <br /> 20 responses from Town Meeting members, and moderately imp. -2 <br /> these 20 responses represent approximately 10%of very important-2 <br /> all Town Meeting members,so we should not [median-moderately important] <br /> discount the TMMA results out of hand. <br /> Traffic Q2: <br /> I will have more comments at our Tuesday night walk comfortably-5 <br /> meeting regarding these results,but I would like to somewhat dangerous- 1 <br /> point out the noticeable lack of consensus among the <br /> TMMA respondents with respect to the 8 managing Other Growth Issues <br /> growth issues(the ones that had to be ranked from 1 Hanscom- 1.6 <br /> to 8).That is, there is not a single issue among the 8 traffic-2.8 <br /> listed that stood out to these respondents.Both the enhance tax base-4.8 <br /> Merriam Hill respondents and the Pine Meadows mansionization-5.0 <br /> respondents ranked Hanscom as the clear#1 issue, pollution-5.0 <br /> but Hanscom was a weak#2 issue according to the auto dependence-5.3 <br /> TMMA respondents.In fact,each of the 8 issues affordable housing-5.8 <br /> received at least one first-place vote from the group center parking-6.0 <br /> of [end of Merriam Hill summary] <br /> TMMA respondents. And all but one of the 8 issues <br /> received at least one last-place vote from the TMMA Pine Meadows neighborhood- 12 responses <br /> respondents. <br /> Open Space Q1: <br /> Summaries of the results: 200 acres- 1 <br /> 500 acres-2 <br /> Merriam Hill Association-6 responses 750 acres-4 <br /> 1000 acres-4 <br /> Open Space Q1: [median-750] <br /> 0 acres- 1 <br /> 300 acres- 1 Open Space Q2: <br /> 500 acres- 1 definitely not-4 <br /> 750 acres- 1 a few units-3 <br /> 1000 acres-2 several units-5 <br /> [median-500/750] [median- a few units] <br /> Open Space Q2: Open Space Q3: <br /> definitely not-2 no tax-3 <br /> a few units-2 R.E. xfer fee-5 <br /> several units-2 prop tax levy- 1 <br /> [median-a few units] both-2 <br /> other- 1 <br /> Open Space Q3: <br /> Managing Growth-27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.