Laserfiche WebLink
The incorporation of solar panels on the roof were discussed and while no hard input has been received for our <br /> current solar providers, input was still being pursued for information of this project. The primary concern <br /> discussed was how the roof edge could be improved to hide solar panels for the ground and perhaps most <br /> importantly from the approach drive which is somewhat higher than grade that the building floor pan. <br /> It was discussed that these architectural factors are as much a part of the "solar ready' moniker and other <br /> building infrastructure. <br /> The expected solar panel layout still needs confirmation but the assumptions currently are a "saw tooth" <br /> ballasted roof mount as we have at other buildings with the high edge of the panel at 10-12 inches above the <br /> deck. The discussion was about determining the height of the parapet needed to hide the panels, especially on <br /> the main approach, but also without going so high that we reduce the available solar area on the roof. It was <br /> hoped that better solar layout and needs for net zero would be available at the next meeting. <br /> Summary for next meeting: <br /> It is anticipated that we will have an energy analysis for the building in January and schedule the next meeting <br /> after that. <br /> It was discussed to have additional information on solar panel layouts and parapet heights for review. <br /> It was expected to have further information on Red List scope that could be included. <br /> It was expected that the next meeting will have a project budget draft for review. <br /> Motion was made and seconded to adjourn at 6:30 pm. <br /> Meeting Adjourned <br />