Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Lexinqton Zoninq Board of Appeals <br /> Selectmen's Meeting Room <br /> May 13, 2021 <br /> Board Members: Chair— Ralph D. Clifford, Jeanne K. Krieger, Nyles N. Barnert, Martha C. <br /> Wood and Associate Beth Masterman <br /> Administrative Staff: Jennifer Gingras, Zoning Administrator and Sharon Coffey, <br /> Administrative Clerk <br /> Address: 181 Marrett Road <br /> The petitioner is requesting a MODIFICATION OF A VARIANCE dated November 23, 1971 <br /> section(s) 135-9.2.2.2 and 135-3.4 (Table 2 Schedule of Dimensional Controls) to allow 1.5 ft <br /> instead of the required 15 ft side yard setback. <br /> The petitioner submitted the following information with the application: Nature and Justification, <br /> topographic plan, plot plan, and floor plans. <br /> Prior to the meeting, the petitions and supporting data were reviewed by the Building <br /> Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Town Engineer, Board of Selectmen, the Planning <br /> Director, the Historic District Commission Clerk, Historical Commission, Economic <br /> Development, and the Zoning Administrator. Comments were received from the Conservation <br /> Administrator and the Zoning Administrator. <br /> Presenter: David Johnson, Architect <br /> Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, announced that Beth Masterman will be sitting as a Board member as <br /> she attended the last hearing and Norman P. Cohen would not be a voting member for this <br /> proposal. <br /> David Johnson presented the petition. He stated after the first hearing with the Board they have <br /> redesigned the plan. Everything is within the confines of the existing setback. They are <br /> removing both shed and driveway encroachments. The existing garage roof is a flat roof and <br /> has been problematic. They propose to, under a Special Permit, to change it to a low pitch roof <br /> to match the existing roof pitches. <br /> A Board Member, Jeanne K. Krieger, questioned the status of the conservation commission <br /> (They met with the Conservation Administrator and went through this current plan. They are <br /> reviewing if they want to go through with the additions at all. The Conservation Administrator <br /> stated the previous plan is considered a determination of non-applicability. So the roof would fall <br /> under that determination). <br /> Mrs. Krieger asked if they are keeping the swimming pool (They are assessing that). <br /> A Board Member, Martha C. Wood, asked if the roof overhang exists as it is (Yes). <br /> Mr. Clifford stated the applicant expressed willingness to remove encumbrances on town land. <br /> He asked if they imposed a condition that required that would it be acceptable (Yes). <br /> Mr. Clifford asked if a condition to remove the two sheds would be acceptable (Yes) <br />