Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pressman inquired about the status of the potential chemical contamination at the site. Ms. <br />Mullins advised that since the Town had yet to close on the property, those discussions were <br />still non - public and being discussed in executive sessions. <br />The Committee discussed additional aspects of the project, including the number of contractors <br />envisioned for the study, utilities currently available at the barn and the Department of Public <br />Facilities role at the site upon transfer of ownership of the parcel and barn to the Town. <br />After a motion duly made and seconded, the Committee voted to recommend $35,000 in CPA <br />funds for the Wright Farm Barn Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study (8 -0 -1). Ms. Shaw <br />abstained from voting. <br />3) Antony Park Discussion and Final Votes- While waiting for the final project applicant to arrive, <br />the Committee began to discuss final votes for FY17 projects. They discussed the Antony Park <br />proposal which requested $60,000 in CPA funds. Mr. Horton questioned if the Committee could <br />decrease the amount of the request prior to issuing their final vote. He reasoned that a <br />decrease in Town money may force the increase of private donations. <br />Ms. Fenollosa noted that project proponent, Dave Pinsonneault was not present and if the CPC <br />voted to decrease the amount, they would do so without being informed of the potential <br />ramifications such a decrease could have on the project. <br />After additional discussion, Mr. Horton moved that the CPC vote to reduce the funding amount <br />from $60,000 to $40,000. The motion was seconded and defeated (2 -7). <br />Mr. Kanter reported his own opposition to the public funding of the project and, although no <br />final position has been taken by the full CEC, he thought it unlikely that committee would <br />recommend such funding. <br />After a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted to recommend $60,000 in CPA funds for <br />the Antony Park construction project (5 -4). <br />4) Lexington Arts and Crafts Society Parsons Gallery Lighting Renovation, Return Interview- Tom <br />Whelan reappeared before the CPC to review the Arts and Crafts Society's decreased funding <br />request. He reported that the Society was able to obtain $12,000 from fundraising and <br />operating funds for the project which off -set their request for CPA funds. They initially <br />requested $32,000 in CPA funding; the revised request seeks just $24,280. Mr. Whelan <br />confirmed that the scope of the project did not change with the decreased request, just the <br />amount being requested in CPA funds. The total project cost is $36,280. <br />After a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted to recommend $24,280 in CPA funds for <br />the Parsons Gallery Lighting Renovation (8 -0). Mr. Wolk recused himself from the discussion <br />and vote since he is a member of the Lexington Arts and Crafts Society. <br />5) Final Votes on FY17 CPA Project Applications- The remainder of final CPC votes on FY17 project <br />applications is as follows. Discussion is noted where relevant. <br />2 <br />