|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2015-12-00-CPC-rpt (Needs Assessment Report)
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
2015-12-00-CPC-rpt (Needs Assessment Report)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 11:20:58 AM
Creation date
12/22/2015 9:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee - Needs Assessment Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town of Lexington <br />Community Preservation Plan <br />Overview <br />Introduction <br />In March of 2006, the residents of Lexington voted to adopt the Community Preservation Act <br />(CPA), which set a 3% surcharge on property tax bills to be supplemented by State matching <br />funds from the Massachusetts Community Preservation Trust Fund. The Lexington Community <br />Preservation Committee (CPC) was appointed at that time to make recommendations to Town <br />Meeting for the use of the funds raised by the surcharge under the CPA. In its initial year, fiscal <br />year 2007 (FY07), the surcharge brought in approximately $2.5 million dollars, which was fully <br />matched with State funds. <br />Since FY07, annual revenue from the local surcharge has steadily increased. Latest figures are <br />available for FY15, for which the surcharge raised $3,981,295. However, State matching funds, <br />which come from a surcharge on Registry of Deeds transaction fees, have fallen since FY08. <br />This is a function of two factors: falling home sales in Massachusetts over the last several years <br />and an increasing number of communities passing CPA by -laws therefore competing for limited <br />funds. (To date there are 158 communities with CPA by- laws). <br />Initial estimates from the Department of Revenue projected the FY16 State match distribution at <br />just 18% of the local surcharge, an all -time low. While the recently released State match figures <br />exceeded those estimates, the match is on -trend with decreasing amounts year over year. <br />Lexington will receive $1,229,774 in FY16, 30.7% of its surcharge. Lexington's state match in <br />FY15 was $1,230,116 (32.6% of the surcharge) and $1,932,347 in FY14 (54% of the surcharge). <br />Despite the decrease in state matching funds, there are several encouraging measures being taken <br />to ensure that the Trust Fund benefits from both short and long -term growth strategies. The <br />FY16 state budget authorized the transfer of $10 million from the FY15 state budget surplus to <br />the CPA Trust Fund, marking the third year in a row the state budget has included such a transfer <br />to this fund. ($11.4 million was transferred to the fund from FY14 and $25 million was <br />transferred from FY13). Prior to the transfer of surplus funds, Lexington's FY13 state match <br />totaled only $929,507. <br />While yearly surplus transfers to the Trust Fund would benefit communities by providing <br />immediate increases in state matching funds, relying on state budget surpluses cannot sustain the <br />CPA as a long -term solution. A piece of legislation introduced earlier this year entitled An Act to <br />Sustain Community Preservation Revenue calls for a review of the fees collected at the Registries <br />of Deeds (the trust fund's primary source of funding). The current transaction fees have not been <br />adjusted since the CPA was signed into law in 2000. The Department of Revenue's Monthly <br />Report of Collections and Refunds released in October 2015 shows an 8.5% increase in <br />collections at the Registries of Deeds compared to last year's figures but the bill seeks a more <br />permanent solution. If passed, it would call upon the Department of Revenue to calculate the <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.