Laserfiche WebLink
Cary Memorial Library <br />Service and lively activity are the key words at Cary Memorial Library. Despite <br />continuous weeding, holdings of magazines, records and books increase yearly, the latter <br />by 10,000 volumes. Circulation has increased by 3,000 over 1965. Circulation refers to <br />the number of items borrowed; it does not measure other services, such as reference. In <br />any one day, about fifty questions from students, adults and industry are answered by our <br />reference staff. Individuals carrying out their own research are in constant attendance at <br />the library. <br />Some innovative programs have been discontinued: a Saturday night film series, <br />adult education classes and Sunday afternoon concerts have been dropped because low at- <br />tendance indicated that the needs were already being met in Lexington. Others have suc- <br />ceeded famously: business and science /technology services, print rentals, multiple copies, <br />art exhibitions, a training course in the use of the library, and a play- reading series. <br />The library's 1966 expenditures amounted to $52,252 for all expenses from books to <br />brooms, and $157,159 for salaries. This was augmented by state aid of 25 cents per capita, <br />or $6,922.75 (1960 census). The trustees have abided by the spirit of the state aid law, to <br />extend and improve library service, and in 1966 this money went towards rental of a Xerox, <br />purchase of a microfilm reader /printer, and purchase of multiple copies of books in high <br />demand. The library also received the back - handed support of delinquent borrowers, who <br />contributed more than $15,000 by paying fines for overdue and lost books. This money was <br />used entirely for books and records. <br />In January, the trustees retained the services of Kenneth Shaffer, Director of <br />Simmons School of Library Science, to develop guidelines for planning the library's future. <br />In brief, Mr. Shaffer agreed with our goal of building a strong book collection such as one <br />might find in a small liberal arts college, but advised that no further expansion in cultural <br />activities be undertaken. An annual increase of at least $5,000 in the book budget was <br />recommended to strengthen the collection, in addition to normal annual increases to meet <br />rising costs of books. Mr. Shaffer also urged closer cooperation between the school li- <br />braries and the public library to insure the efficient use of staff and plants to avoid costly <br />duplications. In line with modern trends in library organization, he suggested a relatively <br />small increase in administrative personnel to direct the work of a considerably augmented <br />clerical staff. These, among other recommendations, are envisaged as part of a twenty to <br />twenty -five year growth and development plan, to enable the library to keep pace with the <br />demands of an expanding population. A copy of Mr. Shaffer's report, "Challenge of Excel- <br />lence," is available at the reference desk. <br />Our library's activities are dramatized by a comparison with other towns in 1965: <br />Per Capita Budget as <br />1965 % of Total <br />Population Circulation Volumes Budget Town Budget <br />Lexington 31,500 13.2 3.5 $ 5.90 2.00 <br />Brookline 54,004 7.9 6.2 10.45 3.60 <br />Arlington 52,482 8.8 2.9 6.77 2.83 <br />Wellesley 26,297 12.5 3.7 6.92 1.48 <br />Winchester 21,891 10.7 10.1 5.94 1.25 <br />It will be seen that, while circulation is very active, our book collection and pur- <br />chasing power are relatively small. Lexington residents really use their library. <br />14 <br />