Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Board <br />Massachusetts General Laws provide that the annual report of a town planning board <br />must contain information regarding ' the condition of the town, plans and proposals for its <br />development and estimates of the cost thereof." <br />With 1965 median income per household of $14,689, Lexington residents are near the <br />top of income range of Metropolitan Boston and Massachusetts municipalities. According to <br />Massachusetts Taxpayers Association our tax rate is also high, only eight cities and five <br />towns among 351 Massachusetts municipalities have adjusted tax rate higher than Lexington. <br />The accompanying table shows Lexington's position among neighboring or comparable towns <br />along Route 128. <br />Rezoning more land for business and industry will not in itself change the land use or <br />reduce the tax rate. Vacant land in Lexington now includes the following: four acres zoned <br />for retail business, 177 acres zoned for research and offices and about 182 acres zoned for <br />light manufacturing. We encourage entrepreneurs seeking Lexington location to use land <br />already zoned, rather than attempt rezoning of additional residential land. This policy has <br />proven successful, stimulated largely by the planning board - sponsored relaxation of lot size <br />and yard requirements in Hartwell Avenue area. <br />The following new firms have located in Lexington since 1966: Amicon, Hewlett - <br />Packard, Honeywell, Instrumentation Lab and Weston - Rotek. The Ginn Company has an- <br />nounced its intention to build in Lexington and several other research and office operations <br />of the same high caliber are now negotiating and may be expected to announce the move to <br />Lexington in 1968. <br />As a general policy, until the available land already zoned for industry and business <br />is largely utilized, the planning board does not expect to support proposals for additional <br />rezoning unless there is assured immediate demand which cannot be met by land already <br />zoned non - residential; unless the rezoning proposal is for a location and a type of use which <br />will not be seriously detrimental to the surrounding areas, either now or in the future; and <br />is in a location such that it will not put extra heavy demand on town services or streets, com- <br />pared to other areas which could be utilized. <br />The implementation of this policy is intended to control and guide the development of <br />the town in a desirable manner and according to long -range plans. <br />It is the belief of the planning board that Lexington should consider what it can do to <br />help alleviate the housing situation in core cities in metropolitan Boston. The board is <br />studying zoning amendments designed to facilitate moderate - income housing. To the extent <br />that such housing may be provided by individual lots, the planning board believes that such <br />small lot developments must be properly planned with adequate nearby open space and that <br />the continued building on small lots laid out long before the emergence of modern concepts of <br />decent housing is not the answer. <br />Green open spaces are one of the most desirable characteristics of Lexington. Their <br />preservation is an important task and an urgent one, as pressures for land development make <br />it economically feasible to build on sites considered unbuildable ten to fifteen years ago. The <br />Personal Services <br />Expenses <br />Staff as of Dec. 31 <br />Five Year Trends in the Planning Board <br />1963 1964 1965 <br />7,533.81 9,320.83 12,373.86 <br />7,704.47 5,009.25 5,232.14 <br />1 1/2 1 1/2 1 1/2 <br />22 <br />1966 <br />13,061.58 <br />6,445.41 <br />1 1/2 <br />1967 <br />17,355.17 <br />3,535.84 <br />1 1/2 <br />1 <br />