Laserfiche WebLink
01/21/15CPC Minutes <br />Mr. Livsey displayed an engineering drawing of the driveway that connects Marrett Road to the LCC. <br />This triggered discussion about the challenges created by the terrain, the driveway’s entrances and <br />exits for the museum and parking, and the necessary grade to have an Americans with Disabilities <br />Act acceptable plan. Comments included the following: <br />If there is a stretch of sidewalk that has steep walls, there could be safety issues associated <br />with snow and ice because the sun would be blocked from melting the snow. <br />There is sidewalk from the parking area to the LCC; new sidewalk is only needed to get to the <br />parking area from Marrett Road. <br />Dropping off pedestrians on Marrett Road should not be encouraged, but there should be a <br />crosswalk for those who walk or take a bus to the facility. <br />The Scottish Rite proprietors do not appear to have liability concerns about the lack of a <br />sidewalk, but they may have liability concerns about the Town building a sidewalk on their <br />property. <br />The Scottish Rite proprietors do not support a sidewalk on the right side of the driveway when <br />heading up the hill; and the Town does not see this as an appropriate option. <br />It was suggested that the Town postpone this project until the facility is open to determine the needs <br />and to see if a second access road is going to be built in the near future. A second access road would <br />provide an alternative location for building a sidewalk. In response, comments included the <br />following: <br />Not having a sidewalk, even temporarily, seems inappropriate for a Town facility. <br />Deferral could mean losing a whole year. <br />If the Scottish Rite proprietors agree to a proposal, funds will be needed to pursue the project. <br />Even if the funds are authorized they don’t have to be spent. <br />A second access road is too far into the future to be a consideration. <br />A motion was made and seconded to approve the use of $50,000 in CPA funds for hiring a firm to <br />design sidewalk alternatives for the LCC. VOTE: 6-2-1 <br />2.Project Updates: <br />Cary Memorial Building Sidewalk: <br /> Mr. Cohen reported that $162,000 is being requested for <br />sidewalk improvements around the Cary Memorial Building. It has not yet been determined who is <br />authorized to approve such improvements, the BoS or the Historic Districts Commission. <br />Minuteman Bikeway Way-Finding Signage: <br />Ms. Fenollosa noted that this Committee <br />previously supported a request for $39,000 for design funds for this project with construction costs <br />identified as $200,000-$300,000. The construction costs are now estimated to be $330,000. She <br />asked if there was any interest in reconsidering the vote; there was none. Mr. Kanter reported that a <br />member of the CEC recently attended a Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination <br />(MAGIC) meeting where there was discussion about plans to develop consistent signage for <br />bikeways in the region. He suggested that this program could potentially “kickstart” the process and <br />save Lexington money. Mr. Canale clarified that the purpose of the MAGIC program is to develop <br />signage for the region’s scenic by-way. He envisions the Lexington project informing the MAGIC <br />project rather than in reverse. It was generally agreed that there should be continued communication <br />3 <br /> <br />