2014-06-03 CONCOM-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Ms. Miller read the engineering review. Mr. Kennedy asked if the patio would be a paved surface. Mr. Russell replied that pavers would be used to construct the patio which would be pitched to the two area drains. Ms. Mullins commented on the need for submittal of paver details. Motion made and seconded to close the hearing, 5-0 in favor. Motion made and seconded to Amend the Order of Conditions as described, 5-0 in favor. 9:07 pm Hearing – 4 Lake Street, NOI DEP# 201-940, BL 899 Applicant: Richard A. Chan, Jr. Second story addition and porch expansion within the 100-foot Buffer Zone Present for the applicant: Andrew Chan, Jr., Homeowner/Applicant Mr. Chan proposed the construction of a second story addition and infiltration system on site. Comments from the Commission as follows: Ms. Miller read the engineering review. Mr. Kennedy commented on the downspout detail for the overflow. Ms. Mullins stated that the overflow is at the inspection port and that a test pit would be necessary for groundwater elevation data. The Commission discussed the overflow at the house and the test pit. Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to June 17, 2014 at 7:00 pm at the request of the applicant, 5-0 in favor. 9:21 pm Hearing – 17 Bryant Road, NOI DEP# 201-937, BL 896 Applicant: Kenneth Ansin Landscaping within the 100-foot Buffer Zone Present for the applicant: Mark Piermarini, Whitman & Bingham Associates Mr. Piermarini gave brief overview of the proposed work and submitted a wetland report and landscape plan. Comments from the Commission as follows: Mr. Kennedy asked if the Commission was approving the wetland line. Ms. Miller asked for a clarification on the existing stone wall. The Commission discussed structures within the 25-foot buffer zone and 50-foot buffer zone. Ms. Mullins commented on the need for details of removal and grading. The homeowner of 51 Sanderson Road commented on flooding in the area and asked how the landscaping proposal would affect the neighboring areas. The applicant was asked to check the floodplain in the area. Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to June 17, 2014 at 7:00 pm at the request of the applicant, 5-0 in favor.