Laserfiche WebLink
Traffic Safety Advisory Committee Meeting: Tuesday, October 7, 2014, <br />Parker <br />Room <br />Bike to Market Day: Tuesday, October 14 <br />Quarterly Transportation ForumOctober 15, 9 am <br />:, Selectmen’s Meeting Room <br />Tri-Town Bike Committee meeting: Saturday, October 25, 9 am, <br />Central School <br />(Senior Center) Lower Level (27 Maple Street, Arlington Center) <br />Moving Together Conference: Thursday, October 30, <br />Boston Park Plaza Hotel <br />Hand Outs: <br />1. Generic Roundabout Design from Richard Canale <br />2. Responses from Lincoln Lab cyclists provided by Jennifer Melot: <br />“When we solicited comments from our bike interest mailing list, we received roughly 40 <br />responses, which came almost entirely from people who regularly pass the <br />\[Hartwell/Maguire\] intersection on their bicycle commute to work. The majority of cyclists <br />thought the proposed roundabout design was a poor idea from a cycling perspective, <br />describing similar multilane roundabouts as "terrifying" to navigate on a bicycle and citing <br />safety concerns. Two particular concerns were being hit from behind by someone <br />speeding around the roundabout with poor visibility, and getting "right-hooked" (where a <br />car makes a right turn into an oncoming cyclist). People did say that a one-lane <br />roundabout would be less frightening to them if the actual (rather than posted) speed of <br />motorists inside the roundabout was 20 mph or lower. Several people said that they avoid <br />larger and faster roundabouts altogether, and mentioned the possibility that having a <br />roundabout in this important intersection would discourage people from using the <br />otherwise excellent Minuteman Bikeway to Hartwell route to work. <br />Research on bicyclists in roundabouts supports the concerns raised by our cycling <br />community. According to the Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic, the safest <br />roundabout for bicycles is a single-lane roundabout, and a roundabout with cycletracks is <br />safer still (bike paths have a worse safety record than either alternative, perhaps because <br />of right hooks) (1, 2). It also states that if bicycle facilities are used inside a roundabout, <br />they must be extremely conspicuous (for example, with differently colored pavement) (1). <br />While some studies have shown that roundabouts improve accident rates for motorists, <br />"Roundabouts... do not have the same positive effect on the number of cyclist accidents" <br />(3). Roundabout designs where cyclists are not separated from motorist traffic are <br />perceived to be dangerous: "Similarly the number of cyclists that perceived the situation <br />with a circulating cyclist and an exiting car as 'very much' or 'to a large extent' dangerous, <br />was significantly larger in roundabouts without a cycle facility than in roundabouts with a <br />cycle facility" (4). Furthermore, discontinuities in bicycle lanes can adversely impact the <br />perceived safety of an entire route: "Most bicycle planners can easily recount anecdotes <br />from citizens mentioning how ending bicycle lanes influence cyclist safety. If a system is <br />only as good as its weakest link, then discontinuities often time comprise this weak link. <br /> <br />