Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Lexington Historical Commission June 18, 2014 <br />Commission that he has seen the area form and the all houses built before 1927 are on the list. He continued <br />that there have been three tear downs on the block within the last three years. Mr. Kelland explained that <br />there are two actions possible. The first action being to find the house not architecturally significant and to <br />remove it from the Inventory. The second action is to apply for a demolition permit which could essentially <br />require waiting a year and then sell the house with a demo permit. Mr. Kelland continued that the <br />Commission would need to look at the reason why there is an area form. Ms. Zimmerman added that her <br />recollection of the Liberty Heights neighborhood was that it started off tiny with a mix of houses and <br />generally speaking everything in that area is subject to demo review. Mr. Rice commented that 38 Tarbell is <br />on the list but his house is not. Mr. Kelland stated that the Commission would need to look at the area form <br />and see how 38 Tarbell Avenue fits. Mr. Kelland suggested Mr. and Mrs. Iverson return for another <br />discussion in July in regards to removing this house from the Inventory. <br />AGENDA ITEM #8 (8:50PM) <br />Informal discussion on proposed plan for 11 Demar Road <br />SUMMARY: <br />Mr. Tim Techler, Architect, explained to the Commission that his plan includes adding insulation on the <br />roof and is proposing a five inch thick composite product and shingles over the existing footprint. Mr. <br />Kalsow stated that the regulations are not precise in what substantiates a roofline change and this plan is so <br />insignificant it doesn’t detract from the house. Mr. Techler added that he plans to use perforated brown <br />flashing so that it ventilates. Ms.Zimmerman commented that this was a great solution. Ms. Fenollosa <br />asked if this plan constitutes demolition. Mr. Techler replied that there is no demolition. Ms. Fenollosa <br />asked the Commission if they need to review. Mr. Kalsow added he supports what is being done and asked <br />how the Commission interprets the alteration of the roof. Ms.Zimmerman continued that this plan was like <br />removing the aluminum siding covering an entire wall but not demolishing. Ms. Fenollosa asked if a formal <br />hearing were required. Mr. Kalsow replied that it was close but he didn’t know. Mr. Kelland stated that he <br />would not call this a demolition. Ms. Zimmerman read the definition of substantial demolition and stated <br />that this proposed plan does not constitute substantial demolition and does not require a review before the <br />Historical Commission. <br />AGENDA ITEM#9 (8:52PM) <br />Updates <br />Ms. Fenollosa and Ms. Zimmerman told the Commission that they had walked through the Community <br />Center with the architect selected by the Town to do the renovations. Ms. Fenollosa commented that a letter <br />needed to be sent to the Massachusetts Historical Commission and a copy to Patrick Goddard stating that <br />the building is significant so a variance should be granted. Mr. Kalsow added that his preference was to <br />support the variation on the open decorative handrail and not support the wall sided handrail. Ms. <br />Zimmerman stated that she would write this letter indicating that Tower Mansion is eligible for listing on <br />the Register. <br />Approval of May 21, 2014 Historical Commission Meeting Minutes <br />MOTION: <br /> moved by Ms. Fenollosa, and seconded, to approve the Minutes of May 21, 2014 as corrected <br />VOTE: <br /> 4-0 in favor <br />5 <br /> <br />