|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2014-06-18-HC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Historical Commission-HC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
2014-06-18-HC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2019 5:40:33 PM
Creation date
8/25/2014 4:12:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - HC - Historical Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town of Lexington Historical Commission June 18, 2014 <br />AGENDA ITEM #3 (7:48PM) <br />Public Hearing on Roof Line Change Application for 59 Gleason Road <br />APPLICANT (S) PRESENT: <br />Mr. Chris Barry, Architect LEED AP, cjb-architect.com, 617-510-6510 <br />Mr. Michael Glavine, 59 Gleason Road, Lexington, Massachusetts 02420 <br />ABUTTER(S) PRESENT: <br />None <br />DOCUMENT(S): <br />Addition and Renovation plans prepared by CJB Architects <br />Letter from George Horowitz Associates, Structural Engineering, 224 Valentine Street, West Newton, Ma <br />02465 <br />Copy of Section R305 Ceiling Height from the 2009 International Residential Code <br />SUMMARY: <br />Mr. Glavine explained that his plan resulted from nine months of research which included looking at <br />designs and obtaining feedback from his neighbors. He continued that he has settled on this design now <br />because of the ceiling height and the staircase which will allow his three children under the age of ten and <br />aging parents to live more comfortably. Mr. Glavine stated that this plan was a long term solution for his <br />family as they would like to remain in the community. <br />Mr. Barry gave a description of the work to be done. The renovation and addition proposed requires the <br />removal of the roof of the existing house. The premise of this project is to save the first floor. Mr. Barry <br />continued that in order to meet financial constraints, the entire kitchen must remain as existing. The <br />existing steep stair to both the basement and second floor will be replaced with a new code complying stair. <br />Mr. Barry added that this work is necessitated by the client’s desire to have a safer connection between the <br />different floor levels for their children. He stated from a design perspective, this also creates a plan more <br />similar to a center entry colonial. The finishes of the existing first floor are to remain except for the <br />hardwood floors in the living room. They have reached the end of their useful life and require replacement. <br />Mr. Barry further proposed changing the vinyl replacement windows with historically sensitive simulated <br />true divided lite windows consisting of six over one sash. The siding will be replaced with a wood clap <br />board as existing. He stated that a colonial theme of similar scale to the existing is carried around to the <br />addition, unifying the home. <br />Mr. Barry summarized a letter from George Horowitz, P.E. which states that after reviewing the plans of the <br />existing house, it seems most probable that the second floor joists are spanning parallel to the ridge and the <br />roof is an unsymmetrical unstable shape. The letter continued that over the years, Mr. Horowitz has seen <br />many roofs of this type suddenly start to move and push the supporting walls out of plumb, occasionally <br />causing a collapse. Mr. Barry added that this letter confirms that this existing condition doesn’t confirm to <br />habitable space and all second floor ceilings are 6’11”. <br />HC COMMENTS <br />: <br /> Mr. Kalsow explained that the present building code accepts existing ceiling height below that. Mr. <br />Kelland asked if the roof angle was being changed.Mr. Barry responded that now a 12 pitch existing and <br />they are proposing a 12 pitch. Ms. Zimmerman asked Mr. Barry if the peak of the structure would be 30 or <br />32. Mr. Barry referred to page four of the plans which indicate the existing peak is 19.6 and the plan would <br />be going to 26 feet which is above the first floor line. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.