Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Permanent Building Committee 4-11-13 <br />5/9/13 <br />Motion to approve monthly invoices totaling $ 2,023,248.08 as presented. <br />Motion Dick 2 Phil Note 6-0-0 <br />nd <br />1.3 Meeting Minute Format <br />(Item Relocated from 2.24 to general business) <br />For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current meeting <br />minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. <br />Mark Barrett is waiting for proposal from PSS. <br />5/10/11 <br />DPF reported a quote received for training on prolog, but could only find out of state vendors approved by the software company. <br />PBC member suggested he knew of a local firm we could get training from that would be more cost effective. <br />10/13/11 <br />DPF reported that it would appear that we would be able to setup training within the next few weeks. <br />12/1/11 <br />DPF again reported that it was hoping to set up the training within the next couple weeks. <br />3/14/13 <br />DPF reported that they had intended to have meeting minute transitioned to prolog by this meeting but had hit a snafu and will <br />need to correspond with the consultant before this can be done. <br />4.0 Bridge & Bowman Renovation Projects <br />4.41 Schedule and Contract <br />11-8-12 <br />Discussion on moving forward with project raised past discussions on contract option discussions with Town Counsel. Parties <br />concerned over moving forward with confidence. <br />PBC asked for discussion with Daedalus Projects for evaluation of project schedule and Options on carrying forward with TLT. <br />Two tasks requested. <br />1. Explore options on contract completion and how each path (termination for cause, termination for convenience, contact <br />bonding company, etc.) would effect project completion, path, schedule, costs, and overall impact to project. <br />2. Examine project schedule (Construction & recovery) from TLT and evaluate the soundness / logic of the schedule, cash <br />flow, and other aspects to be sure what is proposed is sound. <br />Motion to empower Facilities to request proposal, up to $20,000 and to engage Daedalus to perform an evaluation of the proposed <br />project schedule, cash flow, and contract options with TLT for the Bridge & Bowman Project. <br />Motion: Jon 2: Eric Vote: 8-0 <br />nd <br /> <br /> <br />4.43 Discussion with Daedalus on GC Contract <br />12/13/12 <br />Bob White from Daedalus projects led a discussion on the processes and impact of termination of a construction contract. <br />Termination for cause: <br />Can be a very difficult process. Town counsel will need time to review all of the materials and facts before giving advice on whether <br />or not to proceed. Most likely avenue would be failure to administer or to provide skilled labor or materials. Legal costs would <br />same <br />GC for completion. Bonding Company could take 3-6 months to evaluate. Summer 2013 work likely canceled. <br />Termination for convenience: <br />Project would be audited and the town would buy out oh&p from GC. Daedalus estimates approx. $700,000 payment to GC plus <br />cost to re-engineer project and re-bid. There would likely be a premium added by the new GC. Summer 2013 work likely canceled. <br />Overall added costs could easily exceed $1 to 1.5 million. <br />Continuation of Contract with GC: <br />Bob talked with GC and met with the Owners, they want to turn project around. Best advice from Daedalus is work with GC and <br />find a way to make the project better. <br />Brief discussion on expansion of Daedalus services. <br />Daedalus is already on board to review new schedule when it comes out from TLT, and provide feedback on schedule and viability. <br />Any expansion of Daedalus Services can be addressed after schedule review. <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> <br />