Laserfiche WebLink
HC COMMENTS: <br />Mr. Kalsow suggested that Mr. Dvorak include existing elevations as well as proposed elevations when <br />submitting future project plans. Mr. Kalsow asked Mr. Dvorak why the proposed garage height is so tall. <br />Mr. Dvorak explained that there is a challenge with storage space and that the new garage would be built on <br />top of the present garage. Ms. Zimmerman asked if the garage plan would be a slab on grade. Mr. Dvorak <br />agreed that this was indeed the plan. Mr. Kelland asked if the proposed house would be square versus <br />rectangular. Ms. Zimmerman also commented that the proposed house would project out more than the <br />existing structure. Mr. Kelland asked the Commission to consider whether the demo would be detrimental to <br />the neighborhood and cultural resources. <br />Mr. Kelland reviewed the Demolition Delay Bylaw. Mr. Kelland stated he would like to see some delay in <br />making this decision and perhaps a more settled design in keeping with surrounding houses. Ms. <br />Zimmerman mentioned that the scale is inconsistent in the proposal with the houses in the existing <br />neighborhood and told the applicant there is a real art in fitting something in a compatible way. She <br />explained that these were intended to be small houses. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br />Mr. Bob Kirsch, 2 Grimes Road, explained that the previous owners left the house in 1996. He continued <br />that he felt the house doesn’t look bad and that there is some termite damage. Mr. Kirsch also told the <br />Commission that the house needs air conditioning to help eliminate the dampness and humidity that enter <br />through the slab which sweats in the warm weather. <br />The resident from 58 Turning Mill Road explained that their house also has similar holes and questioned <br />Mr. Dvorak if the holes were really the result of termites or was from woodpecker damage, this resident <br />continued that all houses do have mold to some degree as well. The same resident voiced that he would <br />prefer to see the existing house repaired and not demolished and replaced with a new larger structure. <br />Ms. Betsy Sorows, 36 Turning Mill Road, expressed that the proposed project worries her. She relayed that <br />she is concerned that builders will try and make the new house look mid century and modern and it will not <br />fit with the neighborhood. She told the Commission that she likes the area as is. <br />Mr. Darren Conway, 17 Dewey Road, express his concerns that this project could potentially open the door <br />for other homeowners to sell their homes and the whole character of the neighborhood could disappear if <br />million dollar homes are built in their place. <br />MOTION: <br /> moved by Mr. Kalsow and seconded to find the house at 56 Turning Mill Road preferably <br />preserved and the report submitted by John K. Martin, P.E. does not indicate it is not feasible to repair and <br />restore the house. <br />VOTE: <br />3-0 in favor. <br />Town of Lexington Historical Commission Public Hearing Date: March 19, 2014 <br />AGENDA ITEM # 2 (8:19PM) <br />Public Hearing on Full Building Demolition Application at 116 School Street <br />APPLICANT(S) PRESENT: <br />Mr. Chris Dugan, on behalf of homeowner, Ms. Debra Johar <br />Mr. Johar, 116 School Street, Lexington <br />ABUTTER(S) PRESENT: <br />None <br />2 <br /> <br />