Laserfiche WebLink
Scenarios <br />The first scenario, Scenario A. All Projects, shows the values for all of the projects to <br />be funded as suggested by the phasing. This scenario balances with available CPF funds <br />until FY22 when the School Central Administration project for renovation of Old <br />Harrington School is proposed to be funded. This scenario also requires a commitment <br />to debt that exceeds the level of the previously approved excluded debt service. <br />The second option, Scenario B: Priority Projects, removes those projects that did not <br />receive a priority designation by the Committee. While CPF provides a generous source <br />of funding, the total commitment of funds still exceeds the level of debt previously <br />approved by voters. <br />Financial Demands and Risks <br />The findings from this Committee's work are that the projects may be phased in certain <br />ways to reduce the burden on Town finances. However, to accomplish the priority <br />projects within a 10 -year time frame will require a commitment of Town finances that <br />will exceed previous commitments to Town facility building renewal and replacement. <br />The Town buildings considered in this study with more than 500,000 square feet of <br />space are assessed by the Town at more than $100 million. This does not include the <br />value of new construction. The total costs for all projects considered - which includes <br />new construction, replacement buildings and extraordinary improvements - is more than <br />$300 million. <br />With a total of almost 1.3 million square feet of all existing municipal and school <br />buildings, the replacement costs are estimated to be more than $500 million; this is <br />based on projected construction costs averaging $400 per square foot. The calculation <br />of value of the buildings should also consider the value for responsible delivery of public <br />services and for promotion of effective civic discourse and education. Moreover, the <br />value of the historic and iconic buildings as part of the identity of Lexington, beyond <br />the government functions, must be included when calculating the values of the facilities, <br />the ultimate disposition of the buildings and the financial commitments necessary to <br />maintain them. <br />The values of the facilities to the community have been stated, and the costs to create <br />the facilities have been calculated. Because of the very large funding needed to handle <br />even just the highest priority projects, it is clear to this Committee that the willingness <br />of Town residents to support the necessary funding through likely more than one debt - <br />exclusion referendum is essential. The Committee sees no responsible way to defer the <br />needed projects so as to avoid one or more debt exclusions; however, the Committee <br />recognizes it is the Board of Selectmen that will evaluate and decide if and when any <br />such debt exclusions should be recommended to Town Meeting and what project(s) <br />would be included. Therefore, no recommendations are made in that regard. <br />42 LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS <br />