|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2013-08-30-Ad hoc Townwide Facilities Master Planning Committee (Final Report of Committee)
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Ad hoc Townwide Facilities Master Planning Committee - TFMP
>
Reports
>
2013-08-30-Ad hoc Townwide Facilities Master Planning Committee (Final Report of Committee)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2019 4:03:12 PM
Creation date
4/4/2014 2:11:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINANCIAL <br />MODELS <br />Projected Town Budgeting <br />Part of the information used by the Committee to make the recommendations in this <br />report was financial models created to determine what potential costs may apply and <br />if phasing of the capital facilities projects could alleviate some of the financial burden <br />on the Town taxpayers. Those models, as discussed in this chapter and with additional <br />information in Appendix F, have been prepared using the following methodology and <br />criteria. <br />INPUT FOR THE FINANCIAL MODELS <br />The inputs to the models included project costs budgeted by sources of funds. The <br />project costs are adjusted to be future -year amounts based on the start dates for <br />each project in the schedule proposed by the Committee based on its recommended <br />order of executing the projects. These total costs are then projected as yearly costs of <br />indebtedness. The project costs consist of the principal and interest payments due in <br />accordance with the listed terms of the debt instrument. For the purpose of this report, <br />it is assumed that all projects will be financed with debt so the costs of long -term <br />bonds issued by the Town are considered. <br />These costs are then added together and compared with the sources that are available <br />to fund the municipal and school facility projects. Major renovations are identified as <br />"building renewal" and are included with replacement projects. <br />Not included in these models are the costs associated with any short -term debt that <br />may be part of a project's overall financing such as the interest -only Bond Anticipation <br />Notes (BANs). BANs are routinely used to bridge between the initial need for funds <br />and the point when the Town issues the long -term bonds. BANs typically carry an <br />interest that is currently much less than 1 %, and thus that cost is not a material issue. <br />It has been assumed that the majority of any year's cash availability for capital after <br />covering that year's primary obligation to service the debt would be used for routine, <br />yearly capital needs as opposed to the projects addressed in this report. However, <br />CPF cash may be used for smaller project elements such as design fees for historic <br />preservation projects. <br />Project Budgets <br />Project budgets are derived by taking previous project estimates developed within the <br />programming and conceptual planning for each of the buildings and projecting them <br />to future costs using an inflationary factor of 3.5% (see Table 2). The project costs <br />TOWNWIDE FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.