Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wyman, Land Acquisition Committee, discussed two independent appraisals of the <br /> parcel. Each appraisal has a separate breakdown of conservation value and house value. <br /> The first appraisal totaled $4,100,000.00(conservation value $3,300,000.00 and house <br /> value $800,000.00). The second appraisal totaled $3,625,000.00 (conservation value <br /> $3,030,000.00 and house value $595,000.00). The difference between the two <br /> appraisals is $475,000.00. Mr. Wyman explained one reason for the difference is due to <br /> appraisers using different comps. He also noted that both appraisers have 30 years of <br /> experience. Mr. Wyman suggested that the Town take an average of the two in <br /> determining its offering price. It was suggested that the purchase proposal should be <br /> similar to the Wright Farm purchase. <br /> The CPC questioned if the total requested would adequately cover the costs for <br /> renovations, housing restrictions and legal fees. Ms. Mullins estimates that survey costs <br /> and legal fees will be approximately$ 40,000.00. Ms. Kosnoff suggested that that the <br /> project be funded through short term debt or financing. <br /> The CPC questioned the Conservation Commission's priority of projects since the funds <br /> requested are substantial. Conservation responded that this project has been their <br /> highest priority for the last two and a half years and they are not aware of any possible <br /> acquisitions in the near future. Mr. Savage suggested that students from Minuteman <br /> Technical School be utilized on the project to help mitigate costs. <br /> Mr. Hamilton confirmed it was the intent of the Conservation Commission to bring the <br /> acquisition of the parcel to Special Town Meeting in November. A proposal was <br /> presented to the sellers but the Town was still waiting on a response which was <br /> expected in the coming weeks. Without a formal proposal from the Conservation <br /> Commission or an exact dollar amount for the request, the CPC was unable to issue a <br /> recommendation but informally endorsed the proposal, provided that additional <br /> information be forthcoming. <br /> After a motion duly made and seconded, the CPC voted in a roll call vote (9-0) to exit <br /> executive session and return to open session to attend to the remaining agenda items. <br /> The following documents were used at the meeting: <br /> 1) Upper Vine Brook Appraisal A <br /> 2) Upper Vine Brook Appraisal B <br /> 3) Upper Vine Brook Summary <br /> 4) Conceptual layout subdivision <br /> 5) Conceptual layout <br /> 6) Connectivity map <br /> 2 <br />