|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2013-11-14-LBAC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Lexington Bicycle Advisory Committee-LBAC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
2013-11-14-LBAC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2018 4:17:37 PM
Creation date
1/22/2014 11:24:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bedford Street is up for repaving next season. At that time the crossing signal <br />location will likely be moved as recommended in the report. <br /> When Hartwell Ave is improved the crossing signals will be evaluated for proper <br />placement. <br /> Bicycle detectors – such as the ones at Mill Street in Arlington -- are best used <br />for through traffic only and will be considered for Revere Street. <br /> John stated that he will work with public safety regarding the recommendations <br />regarding yield or stop control. He said that the intersections at Season’s Four <br />and the center parking lot crossing are appropriate for a roadway stop sign. He <br />said he was, in principle, in favor of the recommendations, including improving <br />the street markings as outlined in the report. <br /> There was a discussion about bike lanes versus sharrows. On-street parking is a <br />reason why bike lanes aren’t appropriate even if there is adequate lane width. <br />The Town plans to paint sharrows on Waltham Street between Mass Ave and <br />Marrett Road. The committee mentioned the mixing of sharrows and bike lanes <br />in Cambridge as well as the recent addition of markings on Mass Ave in <br />Arlington, which seem to work well: could a combination be considered for <br />Waltham Street? How can by-laws be amended to allow parking and bike lanes <br />to co-exist? <br /> On existing gates and bollards: the report recommends that all gates and <br />bollards pose a safety hazard “and should be removed.” John commented that <br />this may be location-dependent and proposed a meeting with the bike committee, <br />public safety and DPW for January. <br />Chapter 5 (Trailhead and Waysides) Comments: <br /> John said that these recommendations needed a wider discussion to include <br />Dave Pinsonneault as well as representatives from the other Bikeway towns. <br /> \[See earlier comments about welcome signage and/or kiosks at town lines.\] <br />Chapter 6 (Partnership Recommendations) Comments: <br /> Somewhat mixed opinions on this recommendation – ideas are one thing, getting <br />stuff done another. <br /> If a “Joint Powers” group is established, it should be done with care; limit to a <br />small number, including one significant staff person from each town. <br /> Good way to establish common standards, rules and regulations regarding <br />Bikeway use. <br /> At the very least can be useful to improve communication. <br />Chapter 7 (Community Outreach) and Chapter 8 (Policing) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.