Laserfiche WebLink
13. Educational Programming: Please clarify how Lexington residents will be given <br />preference in educational programming. <br />We will consult with the committee to determine which of the following would be <br />valuable for the community: <br />- One of our goals is to find local educators to conduct classes or seminars. All else <br />being equal, we will give preference to instructors from Lexington <br />- Opening up early registration for Lexington residents <br />- Discounted admission to the model Farmyard <br />- Discounted price for FarmBucks <br />14. Exceptions to RFP/Lease Agreement: We are aware that you have some concerns <br />regarding the release of financial information and the inspection of the buildings <br />located on the farm. In the Town's response to bidder questions, dated May 9, we <br />did explain requirement for financial documents and allowance for inspections. <br />After reading your proposal those concerns resurfaced and we would like to be clear <br />on whether or not you intend to: 1) submit annual financials; and 2) require any <br />further information regarding the inspection of existing structures (as we as the <br />Town have nothing to disclose at this time). <br />- Thank you for clarifying this requirement during our meeting. We are willing to give <br />financial statements in order to provide a picture of the financial health of the business. <br />At this time, they will not be audited, we will provide printouts from our accounting <br />software (Quickbooks). Noel's education and work experience in accounting provide the <br />skills to do our own bookkeeping and accounting. <br />- Yes, we would like to pay a professional to conduct an inspection of the structures and <br />get an understanding as to what it will take to "do business" — it is possible that the <br />property has not been inspected for adherence to code, and if we are required to maintain <br />it to local code, we need to understand what costs that would entail. We did not do this <br />prior to submitting our proposal because we did not want to assume the expense if our <br />vision for the property wasn't compatible with the intended use. We understand that it <br />will be our financial responsibility to remove or maintain the structures. If that expense is <br />projected to be significantly more than anticipated revenues, we may need to re- consider <br />our application. <br />15. Financial Capacity: Can you provide more information on your finances year -to- <br />date? Specifically, what caused you to go into deficit in 2011 and 2012 and how did <br />you finance the operating deficits in 2011 and 2012? and what changes have you <br />made to result in a projected positive results in 2013 and what are you 2013 results <br />year -to -date versus projections? <br />- 2011 deficit — initial costs, no established market. Costs were self - financed, the deficit <br />was small <br />7 <br />