Laserfiche WebLink
23 <br />O'CONNELL VS. SKY.ANT. <br />This suit remains in the same position as one year <br />ago. Mr. O'Connell, objecting to the amount of costs, <br />has taken measures to have the matter considered be- <br />fore a proper tribunal. So far as the town is concerned, <br />the case is practically settled. <br />HURD VS. LEXINGTON. <br />This suit has been withdrawn by request of Mr. Hurd, <br />who has paid the costs, and guaranteed not to make <br />any claim against the town. <br />1LANDALL'S BRIDGE. <br />An appropriation of $too was made for building a <br />new bridge. When the appropriation was granted the <br />condition of the piers could not be correctly known ; <br />upon removing the wood -work, the walls were found tobe <br />in good repair, consequently only $82.32 was expended. <br />It was very fortunate that the weakness of the bridge <br />was early discovered, as undoubtedly a serious acci- <br />dent would sooner or later have happened. <br />We have briefly alluded in the foregoing pages to some <br />of the principal matters in which the town is interested. It <br />is presumed that an opinion can now be formed as to <br />the amount of appropriations that will be needed the <br />ensuing year. When an amount is recommended as <br />necessary for any appropriation, whether proposed by <br />the School Committee, Engineers of the Fire Depart- <br />ment, Overseers of the Poor, Highway Surveyors, <br />Assessors or Selectmen, it is supposed that each board <br />of officers has considered the present and prospective <br />needs of the several departments which they represent„ <br />and have made their estimate with a knowledge gained <br />by experience. When a town meeting, in considering <br />a recommendation for any purpose, votes to reduce the <br />amount, under the impulse of the moment, it may, by <br />so doing, create an injury whichinay cost more than <br />will be gained. Discussion or enquiry when for infor- <br />mation, is as it should be and is worthy of notice, but <br />when it is to gratify a selfish desire or mercenary <br />motive, then it is not commendable. The discussion <br />that took place at the time of granting money for the <br />Contingent Grant, made k evident that a misconcep- <br />tion existed as to its necessity, as well as its importance. <br />This grant unlike most of the other grants does not. <br />meet any specific demand, but is used for purposes in <br />general; its limits are measured by demands which are <br />incidental and controlled partly by circumstances. Oie <br />of the largest drafts upon this grant the past year, was <br />for payment of the expenses of Mr. Tidd's suit and the <br />two suits of Dr. Holmes. As the amount paid $1,o64.9o,. <br />will not be required this year, a reduction might per- <br />haps be made with safety. The appropriations for <br />Town Officers, whose duties are sp.cified by the <br />Statute Law, can be made with certainty to cover their <br />expenses. The duties of the selectmen are of so wide <br />a range, that the Statutes state they are indefinable, ex- <br />cept so far as they are universal. By reference to the <br />Town Reports for the past eight or ten years, it will be <br />seen that some of the Town Officers, especially the <br />Selectmen, have frequently been called to perform <br />duties that have involved the expense of car fare, car- <br />riage and horse hire, stationery, postage &c. Such ex- <br />