Laserfiche WebLink
17 <br />Selectmen, that the town adopt some more definite <br />arrangement in regard to the charge of the building ; <br />either give the entire control of the building to the <br />Engineers, or the Selectmen, or a Committee chosen <br />for that purpose. <br />DRAINAGE. <br />Believing that the drainage subject has heretofore <br />been pretty effectually and thoroughly discussed, and <br />all its merits or demerits have by this time become <br />fully understood, and as no portion of the town were <br />the movers or originators of the subject in the first <br />place, except those in or near its centre, and as no <br />citizen expected to beassessed for payment, other than. <br />the abettors or those directly benefited, and as the <br />matter has taken an entirely opposite position from <br />that contemplated in the outset, also as the expenses <br />have been borne by equal taxation upon all tax payers, <br />it is by special request that the absolute expenditures <br />caused by the drainage act, are herewith furnished. <br />and to whom the amount has severally been paid. <br />After the decision declaring the drainage act illegal, <br />it was apparent at once, that the assessinents which <br />had been paid were illegally held ; an appropriation of <br />$823.36. was therefore made at the last April meeting, <br />to repay to the fifteen individuals, who had paid their <br />first installment, with the proviso that they give a <br />receipt in full, releasing the town from all claims or <br />demands arising from the drainage act. Fourteen <br />received back without interest the amount each had <br />paid, and gave a receipt as expressed in the vote. <br />18 <br />Dr. Holmes who had commenced two suits, one <br />against the Collector and Treasurer, and one against <br />the town, not only claimed interest, and the costs which <br />had accrued, but refused to give a receipt releasing the <br />town, alleging for a reason, that he contemplated <br />commencing an action against the town for damages. <br />As the cases were expected to come to trial at the June <br />term, we were under the necessity of doing one of two <br />things, either call a town meeting, or fall back upon <br />the vote which had been passed to sustain its officers. <br />Thinking if the matter was brought before the town <br />again, it would call forth a recapitulation of those <br />wordy scenes, which have done no good to any one, <br />but have aroused a hard, vindictive and acrimonious <br />feeling each against the other, and have as yet accom- <br />plished nothing, we deemed it the wisest course to <br />pay the costs and interest which amounted to $13o.4.6 <br />from the Contingent Grant. <br />It will probably be remembered that an award of <br />$130, was made to Mr. E]isha Tower, as damages to <br />his estate, caused by deepening the bed of the brook <br />which passed through a portion of his land. Mr. <br />Tower during the past year placed his claim for dam- <br />ages in the charge of Mr. Charles Robinson, Jr. Mr. <br />Robinson informed us, that the claim was in his care, <br />and kindly suggested an interview for the purpose of <br />endeavoring to effect a settlement without recourse to <br />law. <br />The matter we fully considered, and notwithstanding <br />the summary manner our recommendation for a settle- <br />ment with Mr. Tidd had been disposed of, and still <br />