Laserfiche WebLink
4/1/13 Minutes <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />April 1, 2013 <br />Place and time: Reed Room, Town Office Building, 6:30 p.m. <br />Members present. Glenn Parker, Chair; John Bartenstein, Vice Chair and Secretary; Robert <br />Cohen; Mollie Garberg; Alan Levine; Susan McLeish; Eric Michelson; Richard Neumeier; <br />Jonina Schonfeld; Rob Addelson (non- voting, ex officio) <br />Members Absent. none <br />Others present: Kevin Batt, Town Counsel; Paul Miniutti, Town Meeting member; Dawn <br />McKenna, Town Meeting member <br />The meeting was called to order at 6:37 p.m. <br />1. Announcements and Liaison Reports. None. <br />2. Articles for the March 2013 Annual Town Meeting — Proposed Amendments: <br />Article 4, Line Item 8500 (Town Clerk Expenses): Mr. Miniutti made a presentation on <br />his proposed amendment to reduce this line item by $40,000 to eliminate funding for <br />electronic voting equipment at Town Meeting. He doesn't believe the program will <br />improve transparency, and he believes that few people are interested in the data. He <br />suggested that the value of this new program doesn't justify the cost. He commented <br />that new technology should be available soon to allow electronic voting using Town <br />Meeting members' smart phones or tablets, which would be more cost effective. <br />Committee members agreed that it was appropriate for Town Meeting to have a healthy <br />debate about this subject, although they do not expect Town Meeting to support the <br />amendment. They noted that other Towns are using electronic voting successfully. <br />Ms. Garberg reported that when she moved to Lexington she wanted to know how her <br />Town Meeting members had voted, and there was no available information. It was also <br />suggested that using personal equipment could create reliability problems. <br />A motion to recommend approval of the amendment failed. VOTE: 0 -9 <br />Article 20 (Establish and Appropriate To and From Specified Stabilization Funds): Mr. <br />Bartenstein read an email from Patrick Mehr, who could not be present, describing his <br />proposal to "amend the main motion under article 20 to increase the amount going into <br />the [Capital Projects/Debt Service Relief/ Building Renewal Fund] by $750,000..." <br />Mr. Mehr believes the FY14 budget should include an additional $750,000 in <br />anticipated new growth revenue, and he believes that putting an equivalent amount of <br />as -yet unallocated revenue into the specified stabilization fund would encourage use of <br />a budget surplus, should it materialize, to reduce taxes in a future year. <br />