Laserfiche WebLink
replacement of the windows in a style that would conform to HDC standards. <br />The HDC-preferred window by Andersen was priced at more than three times <br />the cost of a vinyl alternative ($2,855 versus $931) and Ms. McGuire <br />explained that the Association was seeking funding from the CPC to bridge <br />this difference. She added that the Senior Center and LexHAB will be <br />contracting the replacement of windows on their own. <br />She said the window work would be undertaken over a 5 year period from <br />2011 with approximately 25 windows being replaced each year. She had <br />looked into bridge loans so that the work could be “bundled”, but the <br />Condominium was ineligible for such a loan. She did hope however to <br />consolidate the replacement work, so that the job could be finished before <br />2016. <br />After Ms. Manz’s initial presentation, Mr. Kanter of the Capital Expenditures <br />Committee noted his concerns with the project; that he felt; (1) the primary <br />benefit of the project was to the owners of the units, (2) there remained a <br />question of how much “cost” could be attributed to the HDC request since it <br />was primarily beneficial to the owners, (3) the cost breakdown seemed <br />insufficient, and (4) that not every part of the building would be addressed in <br />the replacement project. <br />Mr. Adler noted that he had been involved with the conversion of the Muzzey <br />High School to condominiums and stated that at that time it was apparent that <br />the windows were going to be problematical. He said he believed it was <br />appropriate for the Town to step in and use CPA funds for the window <br />restoration. He said it was also unfortunate that those who may have moved in <br />to the condominiums did not know of the future expense of the window <br />replacements. <br /> <br />10.Vynebrooke Village Drainage Work <br /> – Since the Hearing had proceeded <br />quickly, Steve Keane was not yet present for the VynebrookeVillage <br />presentation. In his absence, Leo McSweeney, Chair of the Housing Authority <br />(and CPC member) described the project and the request for $364,800 in CPA <br />funds. He noted that the project was a follow-up to design work approved in <br />FY1 by the CPC. He said Mr. Keane had been working with an engineer and <br />with Karen Mullins of the Conservation Commission. He said the drainage <br />work would alleviate flooding in the basements of the units. <br />Mr. Kanter expressed his opinion that it would be critical to have an opinion <br />from the Conservation Commission prior to the project going to Town <br />Meeting. Mr. Adler also pointed out that the CPC would appreciate a letter <br />from Mr. Keane stating that there were no other available funds for this work. <br />5 <br /> <br />